jackalbion
Well-known member
- Aug 30, 2011
- 4,939
Looks like a decent manager, I think we should keep him
Roma is going to be CRAP.Looking forward to the RDZ shake it all about thread.
NoIs there someone seriously saying RDZ out?
Some folk are saying they are not bothered if he leaves or suggesting we’d be better off without him. Some are saying he will leave because he has not got the players he asked for. Yes, some posters have more or less said he might as well go.Is there someone seriously saying RDZ out?
Even the originator of the RDZ out thread isn’t saying “out”.
Really?!If anyone wants swaying to out I do have in my possession a video of RDZ at a Coldplay concert in Italy , belting his lungs out to 'fix you'.
Is there someone seriously saying RDZ out?
Even the originator of the RDZ out thread isn’t saying “out”.
They are accepted facts that we need to play forward much faster (and wider) to beat the low block and that we need a DM beast to sit and shut down the counter attack when we lose possession in the final third. I'm sure they are recognised and accepted by RDZ but he doesn't currently have the (fit) players to execute efficiently.It’s a mark of how we think as a society that viewpoints always have to be categorized by some form of polarity. To hold two opposing views and argue for both is no longer seen as a strength. But I see many posters doing just that, which is encouraging.
RDZ has held a godlike status, fueled by some results, a style of play that is refreshing and statistically dominant when it comes to possession, a media whose obsession is with creating heroes ready for the slaughter, and an attractive and abrasive Latin personality. However, he’s fallible, and we’ve seen those weaknesses long before the media.
Weaknesses do not make a manager a liability though. It may be a cliche but every challenge is an opportunity, and now that teams have worked out how to play against (and exploit) our possession-based play and attempts at the higher press, we need to change. What we are not yet seeing is a change in play or a depth of play. For example, with an Everton or Fulham we perhaps need to think about playing without the ball a bit more. We need to draw them out. And we need our transition play to be lightening fast. I don’t see that happening.
Now, this might not be the right thing to do, but we do need another way of combatting what opponents do. That’s why we have brilliant coaches like RDZ. But he’s not responded yet. Perhaps he feels the players he has only have discipline and intelligence enough to work in one way (note: he will understandably never denigrate his players in public.) Either way, now is the time he will earn his money.
This is what these threads are about. How does our RDZ up or change the game, or see us through this. At the moment we’re “just a sh1t Man City” to coin a phrase. We’ll get there. He’ll get there.
At last some daylightLooks like a decent manager, I think we should keep him