[News] Rant from RMT assistant general secretary during radio interview.

[larus]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...air-meltdown-defending-drunk-tube-driver.html

Just listened to this. I'd be very surprised if anyone can possibly defend the behaviour of this guy. Quite remarkable.

 

[pasty]

Still can't quite believe they want to call a strike over the sacking of a tube driver that failed a breath test

 

[larus]

Still can't quite believe they want to call a strike over the sacking of a tube driver that failed a breath test

The guy had some valid points to make, in respect of the level of alcohol in the persons blood, the fact he's diabetic and questions regarding how the test was done. However, his personal attack on the radio interviewer was way beyond what anyone could class as acceptable.

 

[Chicken Run]

The guy had some valid points to make, in respect of the level of alcohol in the persons blood, the fact he's diabetic and questions regarding how the test was done. However, his personal attack on the radio interviewer was way beyond what anyone could class as acceptable.

Wonder if you'd be so sympathetic to this drivers cause if you lost a friend or loved one and this test was done?

 

[Hyperion]

Interesting though that the media use the word 'Drunk' which is vastly different to being over the limit.

The union guy sounds like a right **** though trying to defend the driver

 

[Norman Baker suck my lozenge]

The driver was NOT over the legal limit,He blew above the company's zero tolerance level,We believe this may have been a false positive reading on a machine that us KNOWN to have failed in the the past.
The RMT asked for the urine sample also given at the time to be tested but LUL had already destroyed it.
The unions stance is for the company to abide by any employment tribunal ruling.

 

[Surrey_Albion]

The driver was NOT over the legal limit,He blew above the company's zero tolerance level,We believe this may have been a false positive reading on a machine that us KNOWN to have failed in the the past.
The RMT asked for the urine sample also given at the time to be tested but LUL had already destroyed it.
The unions stance is for the company to abide by any employment tribunal ruling.

But if the driver knew the company had a zero tolerence.....rules are rules

 

[Thunder Bolt]

But if the driver knew the company had a zero tolerence.....rules are rules

A diabetic can fail a breath test without consuming any alcohol.

 

[TWOCHOICEStom]

But if the driver knew the company had a zero tolerence.....rules are rules

Sadly, this is the right answer for me.

Very harsh if he was fractionally over the limit. If the guy had one whiskey the night before he doesn't "deserve" to lose his job. BUT. If you get paid x thousand pounds per year to do a job. You HAVE to play by the rules or get another job.

 

[Seasider78]

Still can't quite believe they want to call a strike over the sacking of a tube driver that failed a breath test

Exactly this

If the guy has been wrongly treated then this should all be dealt with internally but the idea of threatening strike action over this incident is quite frankly ludicrous and will only further the publics negative perception of unions and reduce any support when they actually have something worthy of strike action

 

[Hugo Rune]

If he was a fantastic employee the company trusted and had a record of good performance, I really don't understand why the company would go to all these efforts to dismiss him. As for Unions, they do what they have to do with no regard for anyone but a minority (usually) of their members. I still find it ironic that the Unions used their block votes in the Labour leadership election to select an unelectable candidate pretty much guaranteeing David Cameron will be Prime Minister for another 5 years. I actually believe many of them would like someone like Thatcher back as PM. A leader that cuts jobs and shuts down industry again would be ideal as it's the fight, strikes and media attention they love.

 

[User removed 4]

The driver was NOT over the legal limit,He blew above the company's zero tolerance level,We believe this may have been a false positive reading on a machine that us KNOWN to have failed in the the past.
The RMT asked for the urine sample also given at the time to be tested but LUL had already destroyed it.
The unions stance is for the company to abide by any employment tribunal ruling.

This.

 

[Westdene Seagull]

The driver was NOT over the legal limit,He blew above the company's zero tolerance level,We believe this may have been a false positive reading on a machine that us KNOWN to have failed in the the past.
The RMT asked for the urine sample also given at the time to be tested but LUL had already destroyed it.
The unions stance is for the company to abide by any employment tribunal ruling.

A diabetic can fail a breath test without consuming any alcohol.

Agreed and I hope the driver gets the justice he / she deserves BUT I'd be worried if I had a pr1ck like that union guy fighting for me. He just failed completely when he was given an opportunity on a plate to get public support for his member. And that is why so many people think unions are pointless relics of a bygone year.

 

[Norman Baker suck my lozenge]

If he was a fantastic employee the company trusted and had a record of good performance, I really don't understand why the company would go to all these efforts to dismiss him. As for Unions, they do what they have to do with no regard for anyone but a minority (usually) of their members. I still find it ironic that the Unions used their block votes in the Labour leadership election to select an unelectable candidate pretty much guaranteeing David Cameron will be Prime Minister for another 5 years. I actually believe many of them would like someone like Thatcher back as PM. A leader that cuts jobs and shuts down industry again would be ideal as it's the fight, strikes and media attention they love.

The individual concerned has 29 years exemplary service(the company's words at his long service award dinner)

 

[blue'n'white]

Sadly, this is the right answer for me.

Very harsh if he was fractionally over the limit. If the guy had one whiskey the night before he doesn't "deserve" to lose his job. BUT. If you get paid x thousand pounds per year to do a job. You HAVE to play by the rules or get another job.

100% agree
Completely indefensible - the RMT are just spoiling for a fight as usual

 

[Stato]

The guy had some valid points to make, in respect of the level of alcohol in the persons blood, the fact he's diabetic and questions regarding how the test was done. However, his personal attack on the radio interviewer was way beyond what anyone could class as acceptable.

It wasn't a personal attack. It was a sarcastic comment on Ferrari's loaded question. The question 'Have you stopped beating your wife?' is often used as an example of a logical fallacy because giving both a yes or no answer will make you guilty. The RMT guy didn't make his point very well or handle his annoyance very calmly, but I found Ferrari's cutting him off, then pontificating when called out on his questioning style more irritating.

 

[brightonbaz]

Edit - Just listened and retract my previous comments except the one regarding chain of custody procedures. What was he thinking about.....

 

[brightn'ove]

A diabetic can fail a breath test without consuming any alcohol.

Are people purposefully choosing to ignore this

 

[Westdene Seagull]

It wasn't a personal attack. It was a sarcastic comment on Ferrari's loaded question. The question 'Have you stopped beating your wife?' is often used as an example of a logical fallacy because giving both a yes or no answer will make you guilty. The RMT guy didn't make his point very well or handle his annoyance very calmly, but I found Ferrari's cutting him off, then pontificating when called out on his questioning style more irritating.

Clearly then I've led a sheltered life if that question is often posed to combat a yes/no question. And of course the RMT dinosaur needs PR training. It's an offensive question and the RMT guy should have just said 'no' and got on with his argument. Instead he's managed to make Ferrari look good and made himself look like a complete prat. Hence why I'd always trust an employment lawyer over a two bit Alf Garnett union rep.

 

[Hugo Rune]

The individual concerned has 29 years exemplary service(the company's words at his long service award dinner)

Then why have they done this? Either the management are after him for unacceptable reasons such as they are attempting to retire him early, the management are incompetent and don't take special measures with a diabetic's breath test, the management believe it is unsafe for a diabetic to drive a train but have no mechanism to remove the worker on those grounds or the sacked worker has a history of drinking and has been suspected of being under the influence at work; therefore the two failed tests are enough to dismiss him.