Neville's Breakfast
Well-known member
Whether their asylum status is legitimate or not is not the issue.
My question was whether the poster was suggesting that the actions of one man should mean no children should be allowed in.
You are rather misrepresenting the point. The posts that you were responding to were not I think specifically about children asylum
Seekers. I agree with you that the Austria story is not really about immigration (I made that point earlier). You have moved the debate on to the subject of children asylum seekers. Using the word children has been a deliberately emotive development in the Calais debate as to most people that conjures an image of a group containing many primary aged youngsters.It is now quite clear that many of those accepted as children into the U.K. are not children and this raises serious safeguarding issues around adults being accepted as children into the fostering, care and school system. The medical and dental bodies have behaved quite disgracefully in refusing to acknowledge and deal with this risk. There is a serious point to be made here and you do appear to not
acknowledge risks that are obvious.
Last edited: