brighton bluenose
Well-known member
I don't actually have a problem with them inviting a variety of guests on to QT. Politicians bore the life out of many of us at times, and a great many of them seem to be disappearing up their own arses, so it's fine by me to offer some different viewpoints.
On that basis, there's no reason why Barton shouldn't have been invited. I missed the comment at the start, which perhaps came as a result of nerves (I certainly saw his apology after being admonished by the woman in the audience). I thought he came across as clueless on Heathrow, but he made the odd valid point on other issues raised. I'm sure there have been worse guests- where he didn't know the answer to something, he just admitted it rather than waffling along and trying to bluff his way round it or dodging the question in the way many politicians do.
Presumably the point of people like him being on is to try and engage a broader audience in political debate. Can't see that being a bad thing.
Is that the first time ever that the word 'admonished' has been used on NSC?!! I like it!