Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
Nice to see a completely wrong player sent off today - there should be some obvious differences - 1 having orange hair, the other not
It will make it easier to appeal the red card.
Nice to see a completely wrong player sent off today - there should be some obvious differences - 1 having orange hair, the other not
Nice to see a completely wrong player sent off today - there should be some obvious differences - 1 having orange hair, the other not
What game was that?
[tweet]571753035673808896[/tweet]
Perhaps Wes said something that got him sent off?
From the bbc sport page
Referee Roger East red-carded Brown and, despite the official speaking to his assistants via his headset, his original decision stood. The fourth official for the game was Martin Atkinson, who was criticised for his refereeing when Chelsea drew with Burnley last week.
After the match, the referees' body in English football released a statement claiming East had seen contact from both O'Shea and Brown on Falcao.
It added that East chose to dismiss Brown and not O'Shea because he thought the former had fouled Falcao while he was in the act of shooting.
I'd be in favour of a massive crackdown on dissent, personally. I'm fed up with watching the likes of John Terry and Wayne Rooney screaming abuse, getting so close to the referee's face, he's probably showering the poor bloke with spit in the process. Yeah, refs make mistakes, well here's news for you, John Terry: so do you, and nobody jumps in your face when you've scored an own goal to tell you what a ****ing tosser you are (not on the pitch, at any rate).
None of that should be permitted (well, I mean, if you read the Laws, it isn't, but it's never enforced in professional football). I'm not a big rugby fan, but there's something quite impressive about the way referees are respected there, no matter what's gone on.
So I'd insist all referees have to be addressed as "Sir" by footballers , I'd dish out instant yellows for the slightest hint of dissent, foul & abusive language, or surrounding the referee, and bring back the ten yard penalty that briefly existed in the Football League until the poor little footballers decided they didn't like it being penalised for breaking the rules.
Sure: we'd get a few games at the start where it ended eight a side, but even footballers would soon learn where the boundaries lie.
Actually, thinking about rugby: I wonder if miking the refs up so that the crowd can hear their rationale for decisions would work? Perhaps that might also crack down on abusive behaviour, as I can't imagine even an overpaid pillock like Terry would want 45,000 people to hear him calling a referee on £75,000 per year a "****ing useless ****".
The ref not saying he made an error and trying to cover up his mistake makes this even more of a mockery and the exact reason I started the thread, so once again a huge mistake was made and the ref will be back next week with no issues, even though he is now lying
Have you seen the tackle in question yet?
I can see why the ref sent off Brown and not Oshea.
That isn't the point though. If you have seen the analysis of the tackle it is clear that O'Shea is the one that fouls Falcao and not Brown, if, and that is a big if, there was any contact from Brown it was inconsequential and not enough to bring Falcao down. Now everyone can make mistakes and what the statement should have said was that the ref saw the foul from O'Shea but allowed play to continue, probably to see if Falcao could stab the ball home but then believed there was further contact from Brown which prevented a goal scoring opportunity hence the sending off. It should then have said that having reviewed the incident they accept a mistake was made.
The fact they haven't said what is clear to everyone is indicative of the arrogance and a major part of the problem with referring in this country.
That isn't the point though. If you have seen the analysis of the tackle it is clear that O'Shea is the one that fouls Falcao and not Brown, if, and that is a big if, there was any contact from Brown it was inconsequential and not enough to bring Falcao down. Now everyone can make mistakes and what the statement should have said was that the ref saw the foul from O'Shea but allowed play to continue, probably to see if Falcao could stab the ball home but then believed there was further contact from Brown which prevented a goal scoring opportunity hence the sending off. It should then have said that having reviewed the incident they accept a mistake was made.
The fact they haven't said what is clear to everyone is indicative of the arrogance and a major part of the problem with referring in this country.
the problem with refs is they are always under the spotlight, even more so now, i wouldnt want to be a referee in this day and age, admitidly the standard is woeful at best this year, but we have created a culture of hounding refs at every decision.
its not just the prem where refs are struggling, if we backed refs and made their jobs easier, there wouldnt be a problem
nobody hounds refs in rugby because the players and fans respect his decision as final
No more arrogant then the players, I don't think the majority of the top refs in this country are.
But when they try and make a joke with the players (Clattenburg with Llalana last year) they get reported, so if they are that way can you blame them for being like that and unapproachable?
I am not denying there is a problem with ref's in this country, but I don't see why they should have to answer for mistakes they have been shown up for making after 5 replays at different angles, players don't.
That isn't the point though. If you have seen the analysis of the tackle it is clear that O'Shea is the one that fouls Falcao and not Brown, if, and that is a big if, there was any contact from Brown it was inconsequential and not enough to bring Falcao down. Now everyone can make mistakes and what the statement should have said was that the ref saw the foul from O'Shea but allowed play to continue, probably to see if Falcao could stab the ball home but then believed there was further contact from Brown which prevented a goal scoring opportunity hence the sending off. It should then have said that having reviewed the incident they accept a mistake was made.
The fact they haven't said what is clear to everyone is indicative of the arrogance and a major part of the problem with referring in this country.