surferdave
New member
- Nov 24, 2012
- 66
You really are an ignorant prat - get you''re facts right before slagging others off
There are way too many reactionaries on this forum these days, with witless knee jerk reactions about everything, but little or no actual knowledge of what they are tediously pontificating about
How does a nation of say 50 million cars produce enough electricity to cope with such a massive increase in electricity needs if everyone switched over?
It's all well and good to propose such ideas, however I've never seen anything which actually says how they propose to provide such huge amounts of electricity.
How does a nation of say 50 million cars produce enough electricity to cope with such a massive increase in electricity needs if everyone switched over?
It's all well and good to propose such ideas, however I've never seen anything which actually says how they propose to provide such huge amounts of electricity.
How does a nation of say 50 million cars produce enough electricity to cope with such a massive increase in electricity needs if everyone switched over?
It's all well and good to propose such ideas, however I've never seen anything which actually says how they propose to provide such huge amounts of electricity.
In several ways. Firstly changing how people travel. There are far too many journeys made in cars that could be done by foot, bike or public transport. There are far too many journeys made by single-occupancy cars. Change 'car culture' and the energy production problem is vastly reduced. Too many goods vehicles are on the road, and rail or the waterways should be used instead (I'm aware of the current capacity problem, but you build more railways and update current ones). Secondly invest heavily in a range of renewable sources; tidal, wave, wind, solar. By having a range of production methods you reduce reliability on one single source. You can also use waste incinerators to generate power (something that should've been done at Newhaven, but wasn't). Build nuclear power stations (designed now, not in the 1950's).
It won't be cheap, quick and easy, but will work over the long term.
The new billionaires of the 21st century will be the people who solve the problem of getting our energy direct from the sun.
http://www.ecoworld.com/energy-fuels/how-much-solar-energy-hits-earth.html
The new billionaires of the 21st century will be the people who solve the problem of getting our energy direct from the sun.
http://www.ecoworld.com/energy-fuels/how-much-solar-energy-hits-earth.html
And then will people moan about them controlling all the power.
This isn't a technological problem, but political.
The world could get all it's energy from a small area of the sahara if everyone agreed on the infra-structure costs, and signing various treaties. Italy has already agreed a solar farm in north africa and will lay a cable across the med to receive it. There are schemes that use the electricity generated to pump sea water, desalinate the water, then use the fresh water to clean the solar mirrors while the excess can irrigate the surrounding area.
You have to have the political will power though.
In several ways. Firstly changing how people travel. There are far too many journeys made in cars that could be done by foot, bike or public transport. There are far too many journeys made by single-occupancy cars. Change 'car culture' and the energy production problem is vastly reduced. Too many goods vehicles are on the road, and rail or the waterways should be used instead (I'm aware of the current capacity problem, but you build more railways and update current ones). Secondly invest heavily in a range of renewable sources; tidal, wave, wind, solar. By having a range of production methods you reduce reliability on one single source. You can also use waste incinerators to generate power (something that should've been done at Newhaven, but wasn't). Build nuclear power stations (designed now, not in the 1950's).
It won't be cheap, quick and easy, but will work over the long term.
"Six protesters are attempting to scale the tallest building in western Europe, The Shard.
Greenpeace said it was protesting against Shell's Arctic drilling, which the oil company said was "not new"."
Some of these people are real idiots.
So Shell are drilling in the Arctic? Good. We need more oil. The Arctic is vast and unused. A little bit of drilling is not going to be a problem.
By changing do you mean forcing them too change?
I can't ever see a car culture disappearing. People like the freedom cars provide.
Car culture is already changing, many people including myself have made changing to their driving habits. there is more car pooling than there once was, even lanes that cannot be used by people with one person in the car and more people are choosing to walk or cycle instead of driving short distances.
I will grant you it is only a small change but these changes are always gradual. From little things, big things grow and all that.
In a nation the size of Australia. The car will always be required.