Either 1, 2,3 or 4.
Hmmmm............
Either 1, 2,3 or 4.
15 points would mean a lot to even these teams?
The format of the cup has worked well for decades, clubs are resting players for possible financial gain in the league.
The only way you can force clubs not to make changes is to either issue big fines or deduct points. Problem with this is too many governing bodies FA, Premier and FL.
Sadly it's become more about money than pride.
Scrap the league cup, only have one cup competition which starts a little earlier and allows for a winter break. The FA cup final should be the final curtain on the football season on a Saturday at 3pm.
What I'm more intrigued about is why teams need to rest their entire first team. Is there any evidence that a cup run hurts a promotion bid?
Gets you relegated......
What I'm more intrigued about is why teams need to rest their entire first team. Is there any evidence that a cup run hurts a promotion bid?
Clubs care about money while fans care about trophies. That's very unfortunate,
It's just crazy, I don't understand it. I'm all for bringing kids into the team but not seven or eight of them. Six rounds from the third round to the final, it's not asking a lot is it?
Alan Shearer critical of FA Cup team selection as Premier League clubs make changes
Clubs making wholesale changes are "cheating fans" out of an FA Cup run, according to BBC pundit Alan Shearer.
Championship sides facing lower-league opposition rotated players, with Leeds making 10 changes, while Brighton and Newcastle made nine.
Is he right? Has he got a point? Who cares?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/38788645
The problem of the FA cup goes far wider than the FA or England. It's FIFA AND UEFA. They don't want any but the very biggest sides (by that I mean richest...so anyone that's got money eg Chelsea rather than say Steau B.) playing each other week in week out. Hence the creation of the Champions cough League. At that moment, the FA Cup became fifth priority. There's also not a cat in hells chance UEFA-FIFA would allow a team outside those they want to see play in the Champions League even if the FA cup winnners were granted entry. The risk of eg Coventry, Wimbledon, Portsmouth, Wigan etc winning and qualifying to play Barcelona etc would be deemed too high risk. Don't forget this is BUSINESS. They don't want TV audiences watching that. Who the feck in China has heard of 2004 finalists Millwall? Jesus Christ people, can you imagine if they'd have won how much CASH might have been lost to UEFAs Smaug-like hoard? Billions might not have watched the following seasons CL early rounds meaning less marketing collateral. This is why the 'level-playing field' was tilted 90 degrees back in the mid 90s.
I'm afraid the FA cup will never be what it once was. The game is run by corporate sociopaths who are never satisfied by their greed. They own all the rights to their ball. Including who plays with it.
Look at the sides still in the FA cup, all qualified for last years CL
8/11 last winners qualified for the CL
1 of the losing finalists qualified for the CL
apart from the fact UEFA would never allow it, its not the "bigger" clubs not taking it seriously that are ruining it.
Why should a team that wins 7 games get a place in the CL over a side that has got in the top 4 over the course of the season?
Er, that's the whole point! To give all clubs that incentive and therefore get them to take it seriously, rather than just the big clubs that can afford to.
Can it start any earlier? There are so many qualifying rounds it might not be possible. I agree with ditching the league cup, it makes sense to do one cup properly rather than two half arsed.