Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Preston North End Vs Man Utd









shaolinpunk

[Insert witty title here]
Nov 28, 2005
7,187
Brighton
As they explained not offside because Rooney didnt touch it or attempt to, he let it pass.

By merely being where he was he was interfering with play; the keeper didn't commit until the ball was past Rooney. Regardless of how people feel about the rule, Martin Keown's incorrect insistence that it could only be offside if he'd touch it is piss poor for a commentator.
 


BensGrandad

New member
Jul 13, 2003
72,015
Haywards Heath
Keown quoted it as per the rule is written. Agreed he was in the line of sight of the keeper but the rule does not take that into account. It is about playing or attempting to play the ball which Rooney didnt.
 


Stevie Boy

Well-known member
Nov 2, 2004
6,364
Horam
****ing Cheat Rooney
 








Dick Head

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Jan 3, 2010
13,891
Quaxxann
What a ****ing shame!
 






maltaseagull

Well-known member
Feb 25, 2009
13,361
Zabbar- Malta
****ing Cheat Rooney

For sure he was not touched by the goalie.


FFS United will ALWAYS get the benefit of the doubt! Really hope Arsenal beat them next round. I so used to like United when Busby was manager, but hate them now.
 


shaolinpunk

[Insert witty title here]
Nov 28, 2005
7,187
Brighton
Keown quoted it as per the rule is written. Agreed he was in the line of sight of the keeper but the rule does not take that into account. It is about playing or attempting to play the ball which Rooney didnt.

"A player in an offside position is only penalised if, at the moment the ball touches or is played by one of his team, he is, in the opinion of the referee, involved in active play by:
- interfering with play or
- interfering with an opponent or
- gaining an advantage by being in that position"

Here's the goal: http://gfycat.com/SecondhandDefiniteCarpenterant

Watch the keeper. As the shot comes in, he sets himself for Rooney to attack the ball, and only dives once it's past him. Of course he's interfering with play by being there. If that shot comes in without Rooney there, the keeper dives straight away and quite possibly saves it.
 






Steve in Japan

Well-known member
NSC Patron
May 9, 2013
4,650
East of Eastbourne
Oh for a commentator that tells the truth rather than parrot the party line. If its a crap decision then say so. Apparently Rooney is now the equivalent of a 747 on final approach at Heathrow..."if you impede his approach, it must be a penalty". Absolute rowlocks.
 


Acker79

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Nov 15, 2008
31,921
Brighton
Keown quoted it as per the rule is written. Agreed he was in the line of sight of the keeper but the rule does not take that into account. It is about playing or attempting to play the ball which Rooney didnt.

The rule absolutely takes that into account.

Offside position
It is not an offence in itself to be in an offside position.

A player is in an offside position if:
• he is nearer to his opponents’ goal line than both the ball and the
second-last opponent

A player is not in an offside position if:
• he is in his own half of the fi eld of play or
• he is level with the second-last opponent or
• he is level with the last two opponents

Offence
A player in an offside position is only penalised if, at the moment the ball
touches or is played by one of his team, he is, in the opinion of the referee,
involved in active play by:
• interfering with play or
• interfering with an opponent or
• gaining an advantage by being in that position

No offence
There is no offside offence if a player receives the ball directly from:
• a goal kick
• a throw-in
• a corner kick​

Defi nitions
In the context of Law 11 – Offside, the following defi nitions apply:
• “nearer to his opponents’ goal line” means that any part of a player’s head,
body or feet is nearer to his opponents’ goal line than both the ball and the
second-last opponent. The arms are not included in this defi nition
• “interfering with play” means playing or touching the ball passed or
touched by a team-mate
• “interfering with an opponent” means preventing an opponent from
playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent’s
line of vision or challenging an opponent for the ball

• “gaining an advantage by being in that position” means playing a ball
i. that rebounds or is defl ected to him off the goalpost, crossbar or an
opponent having been in an offside position
ii. that rebounds, is defl ected or is played to him from a deliberate save
by an opponent having been in an offside position

A player in an offside position receiving the ball from an opponent, who
deliberately plays the ball (except from a deliberate save), is not considered
to have gained an advantage.​
 




BensGrandad

New member
Jul 13, 2003
72,015
Haywards Heath
Oh for a commentator that tells the truth rather than parrot the party line. If its a crap decision then say so. Apparently Rooney is now the equivalent of a 747 on final approach at Heathrow..."if you impede his approach, it must be a penalty". Absolute rowlocks.
He wasnt interfering with an opponent, he was just standing there and then he gets slated for what was a stonewall certain penalty.
 


Robdinho

Well-known member
Jul 26, 2004
1,067
Keown quoted it as per the rule is written. Agreed he was in the line of sight of the keeper but the rule does not take that into account. It is about playing or attempting to play the ball which Rooney didnt.

This is simply not true. The FIFA rulebook makes specific mention of obstructing the goalkeepers line of vision, as well as making a movement which deceives or distracts an opponent - actually touching the ball is not required.
http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/afdeveloping/refereeing/5.%20law%2011_554.pdf
 


nicko31

Well-known member
Jan 7, 2010
18,580
Gods country fortnightly
Rooney, blocked the keepers line of sight for Utd's first goal, dived for the pen. Disappointing indeed...
 










Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here