Neville's Breakfast
Well-known member
Yes agreed for a one off test, but if everyone involved is being regularly tested (twice per week?), then the testing regime as a whole stands up as a practical alternative to more widespread isolation requirements for the group as a whole when individuals test postive.
True, mathematically the more frequent the tests the less likely someone is ultimately going to slip through the net with a false negative. However, that person (who has had multiple tests until testing positive) will have had the potential to infect others for longer. As [MENTION=41330]Pierre the Painter[/MENTION] has said; we will have to see what happens.