blue-shifted
Banned
VAR isn't going away for obvious reasons so we have to get used to it. Your argument for doing away with lines and letting the ref decide with the naked eye is fine if you want to live with five times as many incorrect decisions as we currently have.
The example The Wizard gives is an interesting case in point. Without VAR 20 years ago, I'd guess 80% of the time the lino would have had his flag up and we'd all have shrugged. But the problem is, that would have been the case also if he'd have been 3 inches ONside. It happened ALL the time because officials were too scared to concede contentious goals.
Personally I think we should simplify the VAR rule with the much discussed feet only rule, and then add a time limit to VAR potentially overturning decisions. 30 seconds unless the decision involves a goal or penalty in which case 60 seconds. Something like that anyway.
Fans can get what they want if they are unified .... is I think the lesson which has been learned recently. No need for that sort of fatalism
And if a decision is incorrect by a few mm, then yes, i'm fine with it not being right. Who cares. Let's get on with a game. Let's be able to celebrate a goal, without it being ruled out a couple of minutes later