[Albion] Premier League 21-23/10/23

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊









Weststander

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2011
69,288
Withdean area
I'm not really in disagreement about the penalty as the law stands. The ref was lax but Liverpool benefitted from that by constantly breaking the game up and continued unabated as the ref wouldn't book anyone.

I'm a believer in early yellows when earned. It stops a game of cheating in its tracks.

Most disagree with that, especially punters "The ref wisely allowing one or two early infringements to go".
 


Bozza

You can change this
Helpful Moderator
Jul 4, 2003
57,290
Back in Sussex
Anyone here at Villa Park for the FAC tie January 2010?

Ashley Young was a sewer rat that day, a diving belligerent tw@t. He later perfected diving at Manure, I think one of their managers had to ask him to stop?

Can't stand him, funny to see the red card.
When we had 6,000 down one side?

I handed out thousands of blue and white balloons that day.
 






Weststander

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2011
69,288
Withdean area
When we had 6,000 down one side?

I handed out thousands of blue and white balloons that day.

I think it 6,400, we had the upper tier of the end stand and half of Witton Lane. Favourite chant was a tennis match of "We're the ....... Brighton boys".

Bitterly cold, we stopped at Snow & Rock Chertsey in a detour on the way, as my nipper forgot to bring a coat.
 


Bodian

Well-known member
May 3, 2012
14,262
Cumbria
That’s a penalty because it directly strikes an outstretched arm, the one against us deflected and by the law shouldn’t be a penalty, despite some strange ones being given this season (Dunk and Luton vs Wolves)

Both correct calls IMO, I did however think that Konate was fortunate given the referee deemed that a foul and it stopped a clear break, seen them given as a yellow.
Except that it is not the law. The bit about deflections was taken out a few years ago, as discussed on the thread after the Liverpool game.


This is the law for 2023/24 https://downloads.theifab.com/downloads/laws-of-the-game-2023-24?l=en

Handling the ball​
For the purposes of determining handball offences, the upper boundary of​
the arm is in line with the bottom of the armpit. Not every touch of a​
player’s hand/arm with the ball is an offence.​
It is an offence if a player:​
• deliberately touches the ball with their hand/arm, for example moving the​
hand/arm towards the ball​
• touches the ball with their hand/arm when it has made their body​
unnaturally bigger. A player is considered to have made their body​
unnaturally bigger when the position of their hand/arm is not a consequence​
of, or justifiable by, the player’s body movement for that specific situation. By​
having their hand/arm in such a position, the player takes a risk of their​
hand/arm being hit by the ball and being penalised​
• scores in the opponents’ goal:​
• directly from their hand/arm, even if accidental, including by the​
goalkeeper​
• immediately after the ball has touched their hand/arm, even if accidental​
The goalkeeper has the same restrictions on handling the ball as any other​
player outside the penalty area. If the goalkeeper handles the ball inside their​
penalty area when not permitted to do so, an indirect free kick is awarded but​
there is no disciplinary sanction. However, if the offence is playing the ball a​
second time (with or without the hand/arm) after a restart before it touches​
another player, the goalkeeper must be sanctioned if the offence stops a​
promising attack or denies an opponent or the opposing team a goal or an​
obvious goal-scoring opportunity.​


This is the law from 2019-2020 https://downloads.theifab.com/downloads/laws-of-the-game-2019-20?l=en

Handling the ball​
It is an offence if a player:​
• deliberately touches the ball with their hand/arm, including moving the​
hand/arm towards the ball​
• gains possession/control of the ball after it has touched their hand/arm​
and then:​
• scores in the opponents’ goal​
• creates a goal-scoring opportunity​
• scores in the opponents’ goal directly from their hand/arm, even if​
accidental, including by the goalkeeper​
It is usually an offence if a player:​
• touches the ball with their hand/arm when:​
• the hand/arm has made their body unnaturally bigger​
• the hand/arm is above/beyond their shoulder level (unless the player​
deliberately plays the ball which then touches their hand/arm)​
The above offences apply even if the ball touches a player’s hand/arm​
directly from the head or body (including the foot) of another player who is​
close.​
Except for the above offences, it is not usually an offence if the ball touches
a player’s hand/arm:
• directly from the player’s own head or body (including the foot)
• directly from the head or body (including the foot) of another player who is close
• if the hand/arm is close to the body and does not make the body unnaturally​
bigger​
• when a player falls and the hand/arm is between the body and the ground to​
support the body, but not extended laterally or vertically away from the body​
The goalkeeper has the same restrictions on handling the ball as any other​
player outside the penalty area. If the goalkeeper handles the ball inside their​
penalty area when not permitted to do so, an indirect free kick is awarded but​
there is no disciplinary sanction​


You'll note those bold exceptions do not exist in the current laws of the game. They were specifically removed. It's why the Luton were given a penalty v Wolves - because according to the current laws of the game, there is no 'it came off my own body' exception.
 


Acker79

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Nov 15, 2008
31,921
Brighton
That’s a penalty because it directly strikes an outstretched arm, the one against us deflected and by the law shouldn’t be a penalty, despite some strange ones being given this season (Dunk and Luton vs Wolves)

Both correct calls IMO, I did however think that Konate was fortunate given the referee deemed that a foul and it stopped a clear break, seen them given as a yellow.
If you think it followed the law because it struck his leg first, you're wrong. That exception was removed in 2021. Howard Webb spoke on one of his TV appearances noting an arm in an 'unnatural position' trumps it coming off the player's own body - I believe in relation to the Luton/Wolves penalty).

Dunk's shouldn't have been a penalty because his arm wasn't in an unnatural position.
 




jimhigham

Je Suis Rhino
Apr 25, 2009
8,039
Woking
Newcastle 1-0 Palace

Goal disallowed for offside but reinstated following a VAR check.

Shame. :lol:
 
















jcdenton08

Offended Liver Sausage
NSC Patron
Oct 17, 2008
14,526
Never thought I’d be rooting for Arsenal but I hope they give Chelsea a spanking
 


The Wizard

Well-known member
Jul 2, 2009
18,399
Remember at the start of the season when they said they would be booking players for getting in referees faces, adding on all wasted time, booking players for kicking the ball away etc

That lasted long didn’t it, Chelsea players surrounding the referee constantly already
 


WhingForPresident

.
NSC Patron
Feb 23, 2009
17,268
Marlborough
Ref in this game is a spineless twat. Gave Zinchenko a yellow because the fans were shouting for it and players got in his face over Rice not getting one. Now Chelsea players surrounding him at every opportunity and getting away with it.

Chelsea about to get a pen here. f*** knows what is/isn't a handball anymore.
 








The Wizard

Well-known member
Jul 2, 2009
18,399
Why did it take so long to decide on a penalty looking at those replays?
Surely due to proximity? Ball hits his hand but it’s from about a yard away, just not sure how players are meant to jump at that angle without arms flaying.

Can see why it’s given
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top