Dean Smith LOL. 
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Albion] Premier League 16-23/01
- Thread starter Bozza
- Start date
Washie
Well-known member
Surely offside
I’d be livid if that was us.
Mings had control of the ball, how can a tackle be offside?
Motogull
Todd Warrior
- Sep 16, 2005
- 10,489
Well, it is picked by the waistcoatwanker.
Anyway, Bernie's turn to say "pick that out".
Surely offside
I’d be livid if that was us.
Walton is saying it was offside.......
Because he gained an advantage by being offside.
Mings may have known he was there, but used his chest on the presumption he wouldn’t challenge because he knew he (City player) was offside or if he did challenge the flag would go up.
Washie
Well-known member
So correct decision was made
Green Cross Code Man
Wunt be druv
Wasn't it because there was another villa player further down the pitch from Mings?
Washie
Well-known member
He made no attempt to the win the ball until Villa had possession, he didn't actually interfere with play.
LamieRobertson
Not awoke
Surely offside
I’d be livid if that was us.
Got away with it last season when clearly Sheffield Utd scored...would they even still be in the PL if the correct decision been made....zero sympathy
LamieRobertson
Not awoke
What’s Micmac going on about just because something was going wide doesn’t mean u don’t give it 
I’d suggest making a challenge on the blind side of a defender is interfering. If he’s onside Mings clears or he doesn’t make the challenge.
City have gained an advantage by being offside.
Villa would have much rather taken the free kick rather than play on.
Green Cross Code Man
Wunt be druv
The man's a fool.What’s Micmac going on about just because something was going wide doesn’t mean u don’t give it
Washie
Well-known member
But the challenge came after Mings had the ball, that's when he interfered with play.
blockhseagull
Well-known member
Didn’t we have a similar (ish) situation when Kayal fouled an offside player and a pen was given against us against Leicester ?
He wasn’t offside because he never touched it ... but if he hadn’t been in an offside position the ball would have rolled out of play and no need for the challenge.
SweatyMexican
Well-known member
- Mar 31, 2013
- 4,155
Mings had no idea he was there because the player was behind him. The city player gained an advantage from being in an offside position.
Coldeanseagull
Opinionated
Can't see anything wrong myself
Sockboy starts to cry, their manager can't keep his gob shut......all good
Sockboy starts to cry, their manager can't keep his gob shut......all good
portslade seagull
Well-known member
That was a great game and the 1st goal shouldn't have stood
Washie
Well-known member
But he used the advantage after Mings had the ball, which is a different phase of play.
Looking forward to Smith’s post match interview 
No Sympathy as they are only in the league because of a bad decision.
But that was an awful decision. No where near onside and they will come out and say as much in a couple of months.
In the meantime no doubt you will get the usuall lot telling you there was no issue a bit like Connellys pen against Everton.
But that was an awful decision. No where near onside and they will come out and say as much in a couple of months.
In the meantime no doubt you will get the usuall lot telling you there was no issue a bit like Connellys pen against Everton.