Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] Premier League 16-23/01









big nuts

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2011
4,877
Hove
But he used the advantage after Mings had the ball, which is a different phase of play.

For me it’s not another phase of play. Mings has chested it and a bloke standing 30 yards offside has robbed him of the ball.

Villa would much rather have a free kick there. They have been given no advantage and it’s a City offence. It makes no sense.
 


dazzer6666

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Mar 27, 2013
55,530
Burgess Hill
Is it because he was slightly behind the villa player when he tackled him so was back to onside ?

Nope...seems as Mings deliberately played the ball, correct decision was made as player wouldn’t be deemed offside. PL confirmed the decision and Walton has now read the rule and realised he got ANOTHER thing wrong :shit::shit:
 


Washie

Well-known member
Jun 20, 2011
6,052
Eastbourne
For me it’s not another phase of play. Mings has chested it and a bloke standing 30 yards offside has robbed him of the ball.

Villa would much rather have a free kick there. They have been given no advantage and it’s a City offence. It makes no sense.

Once mings has control of the ball, a new phase of play has been entered.
 




DavidinSouthampton

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jan 3, 2012
17,351
That was a great game and the 1st goal shouldn't have stood

Oh yes it should! Oh sorry, pantomime season over.
Mings played him onside.
And of course the penalty was a penalty. It hit his hand, which was stuck up in the air!
 


SweatyMexican

Well-known member
Mar 31, 2013
4,155
Once mings has control of the ball, a new phase of play has been entered.

For me it’s the same phase of play. Mings would’ve protected the ball completely differently had he known a player was behind him. The ball hadn’t even hit the floor before the City player was challenging for it. Mings has no control over the situation whatsoever.
 


hans kraay fan club

The voice of reason.
Helpful Moderator
Mar 16, 2005
62,759
Chandlers Ford
Peter Walton stealing a living. He’s literally being paid, just to be there and clarify rules and decisions - and has just admitted to having to go and read the law, before admitting he got it 100% wrong.

Shameful.
 






big nuts

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2011
4,877
Hove
Once mings has control of the ball, a new phase of play has been entered.

Villa get no advantage at all. They would much rather take a free kick and play from there.

The rules are wrong when a team committing the offence get the advantage.
 


Washie

Well-known member
Jun 20, 2011
6,052
Eastbourne
For me it’s the same phase of play. Mings would’ve protected the ball completely differently had he known a player was behind him. The ball hadn’t even hit the floor before the City player was challenging for it. Mings has no control over the situation whatsoever.

But that isn't how it works. A player in an offside position, receiving the ball from an opponent who deliberately plays the ball, is not considered to have gained an advantage. Mings deliberately played the ball. So under the laws of the game, he is onside,
 






Icy Gull

Back on the rollercoaster
Jul 5, 2003
72,015
Anyone who feels any sympathy for Villa needs to have a word with themselves imo. They shouldn’t even be in the division
 


dazzer6666

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Mar 27, 2013
55,530
Burgess Hill
But that isn't how it works. A player in an offside position, receiving the ball from an opponent who deliberately plays the ball, is not considered to have gained an advantage. Mings deliberately played the ball. So under the laws of the game, he is onside,

Hardly surprising people don’t know when that **** Walton didn’t either
 




Munkfish

Well-known member
May 1, 2006
12,088
But that isn't how it works. A player in an offside position, receiving the ball from an opponent who deliberately plays the ball, is not considered to have gained an advantage. Mings deliberately played the ball. So under the laws of the game, he is onside,

I fully appreciate that. But the player is then offside for interfering with play before the ball is played as it impacts Minds decision.
 






Motogull

Todd Warrior
Sep 16, 2005
10,475
Dodgy De Gea again.

Typical continental 'keeper facing that sort of shot. You can't train it out of him I guess.
 








Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here