Poyet to Sunderland

[B.W.]

Ah, but you know something that we don't know, so until we know what you know, we're in the dark.

True. And you KNOW I can't share.

<< Dupe >> No idea how that happened!

 

[symyjym]

Have you read that article? Especially this bit

Sunderland owner Ellis Short is impressed with the job he did on the south coast.
Short has also been told Poyet is a considerably better tactician than Di Canio and does not possess the same egotistical and confrontational management style.

Yep that's why I said "I can't see this not happening now"

 

[Thunder Bolt]

True. And you KNOW I can't share.

You've answered that one before. You're so obsessed that you're losing count of which posts you've already answered.

 

[The Large One]

NOTHING from his side. The TRUTH from the club's...

How do you know it's 'the truth', especially if you don't know the counter-arguments?

 

[Westdene Seagull]

As I said earlier, I can see it happening, and I hope it does. Can't wait for him to start touting himself for the better jobs he 'so richly deserves' again. We can redeploy any monies set aside to pay off the goon. And the Gus lovers can then finally move on too (I hope).

Suggesting you have.

I certainly have. I'm concentrating on supporting the club and its new manager, rather than the big-mouthed fool who tried (and failed) to put himself first, and the club a very distant second. Maybe you and your cronies should too?

Claiming you have.

I can't move on with the threat that Gus may (he shouldn't, for his own sake) take legal action and therefore inflict (further) damage on the club. I have moved on in the sense that I see right through Gus and am glad to see the back of him.

Proving you haven't.

Need any more evidence that you're a lying, idiotic, pathetic shit ?

 

[Insel affe]

Jesus read these comments about Poyet from Sunderland fans

http://www.readytogo.net/smb/threads/poyet-interview-tomorrow.814840/

 

[Old Hadlothian]

Done deal apparently (from a source close to Sunderland)

 

[B.W.]

You've answered that one before. You're so obsessed that you're losing count of which posts you've already answered.

Really not sure what happened there TBH! My apologies.

 

[B.W.]

How do you know it's 'the truth', especially if you don't know the counter-arguments?

I trust the person who told me. I trust my club. I'm not disloyal like you.

 

[B.W.]

Suggesting you have.



Claiming you have.



Proving you haven't.

Need any more evidence that you're a lying, idiotic, pathetic shit ?

You've admirably proved my point that I clarified what I meant by moving on in my case. Thank you for that.

 

[glasfryn]

I trust the person who told me. I trust my club. I'm not disloyal like you.

 

[Acker79]

I trust the person who told me. I trust my club. I'm not disloyal like you.

To question the club's actions makes someone disloyal?

 

[Guinness Boy]

I trust my club. I'm not disloyal like you.

Bang out of order and quite stupid.

 

[B.W.]

You've admirably proved my point that I clarified what I meant by moving on in my case. Thank you for that.

You also admirably demonstrated in your last sentence why you are not worth taking any notice of. So thank you again WS.

 

[B.W.]

To question the club's actions makes someone disloyal?

Not always, but repeatedly, and without justification, yes.

 

[Thunder Bolt]

You also admirably demonstrated in your last sentence why you are not worth taking any notice of. So thank you again WS.

Now you're quoting yourself. You have lost the plot.

 

[glasfryn]

You also admirably demonstrated in your last sentence why you are not worth taking any notice of. So thank you again WS.

are you pissed or just stupid you quoted yourself....

 

[B.W.]

Bang out of order and quite stupid.

TBH I'm sick of TLO's childish ramblings and insults, so feel justified in hitting back.

 

[Thunder Bolt]

TBH I'm sick of TLO's childish ramblings and insults, so feel justified in hitting back.

Abusing someone for having a different opinion? I didn't see any insults from the Large One.

 

[Westdene Seagull]

You've admirably proved my point that I clarified what I meant by moving on in my case. Thank you for that.

No, clarification means reasserting, using alternative language, the same argument. You have changed from "moving on" to "not moving on" - that's back peddling.