D
Deleted member 22389
Guest
I want Gus to do well too, however I would love him to come down with Sunderland in the FA Cup. That would be as bigger match as Arsenal, Palace for me.
I'm clearly in a very small camp of hoping Gus does well if he get's the job ! If nothing else it would rub the bitter and twisted up the wrong way.
I'm with you. I don't understand the bitterness and twisting of facts to suit prejudices. He did a great job with us. It finished and now we should all move on. There are quite a few on here who are still determined to paint things worse than they actually were.
apart from the point of what he knew in advance, this isnt even accurate: the announcment was while the first half of the game, not while he was on TV. if the producers had decided otherwise, it wouldnt even have been noted at half time. (was the game that dull?)
You should listen to the Albion roar episode with nick szcepanik. That was a cock up by the Albion but the media knew the story immediately and were on it. Nobody can blame the BBC for covering what was a huge story that landed straight in their laps.
What like you have
I'm with you. I don't understand the bitterness and twisting of facts to suit prejudices. He did a great job with us. It finished and now we should all move on. There are quite a few on here who are still determined to paint things worse than they actually were.
Firstly, can you debate the subject without the spitefulness, and secondly, Poyet was upset about being sacked for 'gross misconduct'. Without going into the ins and outs of the situation, he said he wanted to clear his name. He understood if results on the field weren't positive that a sacking is inevitable, but having that hanging over him, is the reason he was thinking of going to court.
Magilton took Ipswich to court and although it took 3 years, he won his case for being sacked for allegedly hitting a player in the changing room. I'm not saying that Poyet will carry on with his case, but getting a new job will not necessarily cease any action that he wants to take.
I think he is more than happy for the truth to come out
If he goes to court, he loses. .
Could it not simply have been that he would be sacked by a certain time unless a compromise agreement was reached ?
The deadline for the agreement passed without outcome, and so the sacking was actioned at the deadline as warned ?
LoL! On what basis?
This would be the icing on the cake that is the farce at Sunderland.
For me it would like being infatuated with a woman and worshiping from afar but believing you have no chance. Then just when you've realised what a nasty bitch she is and that beneath the powder and paint she's ugly as sin, she saunters over and says "I hear you fancy me, well shall we go ?"
According to The Guardian, Gus is having reservations because the Sunderland director of football wields so much power. Surely that's going to be the same at any club he goes to at a higher level - there are going to be bigger hierarchies than we have at Brighton scrutinising every aspect of the playing budget and having a say on transfers in and out of the club, and I doubt Gus will ever get the autonomy he craves. Or anything like the autonomy he enjoyed with us, however limited he may have believed that was.
It's possible, but if so the wording of their statement is inaccurate and should have read that their negotiations had a deadline. Also, why would gus agree to a deadline that expired while he was on TV? And again, even if that was the deadline for their negotiations, why did the club release the statement confirming his firing while he was "on" tv? The statement isn't a requirement of firing him, it could have waited.