Pavilionaire
Well-known member
- Jul 7, 2003
- 31,274
In the above YouTube video Rory makes a good case for sacking Potter, just as Matt Law's article presented sound reasons why Chelsea are not inclined to do that now.
I think if you're looking for a third perspective then look at Brighton under De Zerbi. I think the better we do the worse it gets for Potter. This squad is scoring goals, winning matches. We could have settled for a point vs Fulham but that is not De Zerbi's style, and this is why we draw fewer matches than we did under Potter. It is proof that Potter is a cautious manager.
I agree with Rory that the Aubameyang situation is farcical - Potter HAD to make that work and - similarly - Sterling hasn't worked under Potter either. Most fans would have looked as those two and thought they'd have had 15 Prem goals between them by now. And that's not to mention Broja. 40 Prem appearances between the 3 of them, just 6 goals combined, and only 1 since the World Cup. Give RDZ those 3 and we'd be Top 4.
I think if you're looking for a third perspective then look at Brighton under De Zerbi. I think the better we do the worse it gets for Potter. This squad is scoring goals, winning matches. We could have settled for a point vs Fulham but that is not De Zerbi's style, and this is why we draw fewer matches than we did under Potter. It is proof that Potter is a cautious manager.
I agree with Rory that the Aubameyang situation is farcical - Potter HAD to make that work and - similarly - Sterling hasn't worked under Potter either. Most fans would have looked as those two and thought they'd have had 15 Prem goals between them by now. And that's not to mention Broja. 40 Prem appearances between the 3 of them, just 6 goals combined, and only 1 since the World Cup. Give RDZ those 3 and we'd be Top 4.