Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Post counts: Yay or nay?

Should we display post counts?

  • Yay

    Votes: 136 61.8%
  • Nay

    Votes: 84 38.2%

  • Total voters
    220
  • Poll closed .








Gully

Monkey in a seagull suit.
Apr 24, 2004
16,812
Way out west
Sadly I have to agree with this. Post count and join date can be useful indicators to the validity of a post

Sadly I have to agree with this too, we have recently seen a spate of trolls posting rubbish about players joining, etc, as their first or second post...if you haven't been on NSC for a while, which can happen, then there are few other ways of sorting the rubbish from the...well, less rubbish!
 








Da Man Clay

T'Blades
Dec 16, 2004
16,286
Sadly I have to agree with this too, we have recently seen a spate of trolls posting rubbish about players joining, etc, as their first or second post...if you haven't been on NSC for a while, which can happen, then there are few other ways of sorting the rubbish from the...well, less rubbish!

Spot on.
 


Tim Over Whelmed

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 24, 2007
10,660
Arundel
If it costs, causes a problem or creates work I'd say off, if not I'd say leave on. Voted OFF though in the hope of a binfest!
 


Carrot Cruncher

NHS Slave
Helpful Moderator
Jul 30, 2003
5,053
Southampton, United Kingdom
Is there a way of not displaying them in posts, but for them to still be visible under 'user profile'? If so, that would be my suggestion. That way people who query posts by 'JCLs/newbies' can check and possibly choose to ignore and the ones who aren't fussed can carry on as normal.
 






Husty

Mooderator
Oct 18, 2008
11,998
Replace the numbers with named categories, beginning with the JCL category for new members, and ending with the super-fan category for the top 5% (or whatever) of post counts (which are hidden).
 


Here's Johnny!

All work and no play.....
Nov 27, 2008
474
Worthing
so what your saying is that newbies dont know anything about BHA and dont have an opinion. post count is irrelevant when it comes to stupid posts.

Obviously not looking at your post.

TMP said "some of the newbies" by no means did I read that as "every new fan being clueless about all things related BHA".

Don't be so precious.
 






Brovion

In my defence, I was left unsupervised.
NSC Patron
Jul 6, 2003
19,888
leave it alone - I can't think of any forum that omits a post count so why is it such a bad thing on here?
Indeed. The objections seem to be solely that people with big post counts see themselves as 'superior', which is just bollocks. I've never seen anybody say "well my post count is 20,000 and yours is only 900 so therefore I'm right".
 






Icy Gull

Back on the rollercoaster
Jul 5, 2003
72,015
Indeed. The objections seem to be solely that people with big post counts see themselves as 'superior', which is just bollocks. I've never seen anybody say "well my post count is 20,000 and yours is only 900 so therefore I'm right".

In fact, the opposite. It's embarrassing to have my post count, not a thing of pride. Get rid.
 


Diego Napier

Well-known member
Mar 27, 2010
4,416
Keep them. It gives you some clue as to how to take a post. There is so much complete and utter bollox posted by some of the newbies that it's handy to know so you can ignore them.

a. I don't need a post count to tell me if someone is posting complete and utter bollox
b. Complete and utter bollox isn't the exclusive preserve of the newbies!
 










The Sock of Poskett

The best is yet to come (spoiler alert)
Jun 12, 2009
2,836
Is there a way of not displaying them in posts, but for them to still be visible under 'user profile'? If so, that would be my suggestion. That way people who query posts by 'JCLs/newbies' can check and possibly choose to ignore and the ones who aren't fussed can carry on as normal.

What he say
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here