I know he has an extreme view on conspiracies etc, but I think he was taking the piss with that one.He's serious, not worth arguing or debating with.
I know he has an extreme view on conspiracies etc, but I think he was taking the piss with that one.He's serious, not worth arguing or debating with.
Face-saving Malaysians you say?
I know he has an extreme view on conspiracies etc, but I think he was taking the piss with that one.
Quite and I'm in a panic now; what's happened to the 2nd and 3rd Laws of Thermodynamics Mr hybrid?
Isnt it also true that all B777's have sensors that continually send data to Boeing whilst in flight? If true I'm guessing that they have a lot more data about the flight than they are letting on.
ABC News’ Martha Raddatz is known for having well-cultivated sources inside the defense department. Earlier today she quoted an unnamed “senior Pentagon official” as saying the USS Kidd, a destroyer, was moving to the Indian Ocean to search for MH370.
Raddatz’s report makes clear that the Indian Ocean search was not mutually exclusive with search activity elsewhere and the United States is joined in the search on multiple fronts across a wide stretch of land and sea.
Here’s the top of Raddatz’s report:
U.S. officials have an “indication” the missing Malaysia Airlines jetliner may have crashed in the Indian Ocean and is moving the USS Kidd to the area to begin searching.
It will take another 24 hours to move the ship into position, a senior Pentagon official told ABC News.
“We have an indication the plane went down in the Indian Ocean,” the senior official said.
The official said there were indications that the plane flew four or five hours after disappearing from radar and that they believe it went into the water.
Malaysian officials opened a news conference Thursday by calling reports that the plane continued to send signals after disappearing at 1.07am local time “inaccurate.”
the fella on sky news this morning came up with this theory, a catastrophic de compression,coinsiding with the oxeygen system failuring, just as they switched from malaysian to vietnamese airspace
the crew reacted initionally,but passed out,leaving the stricken plane with 3000 miles worth of fuel on board to carry on flying on autopilot towards the Indian ocean,thus becoming a needle in a haystack
I disagree Guinessboy..I think its the news agencies job to present news...not speculation, not theories, not some 'experts' opinions.... .. they used to do it like that, but now with 24 hrs news broadcasting, the seem to feel the need to jump on a story that has legs and keep running with it, just to fill the airtime...to spend an hour saying the same thing, using different sentences and 'experts' seems like laziness to me....its not like its the only story just now is it?.. Ukraine...the forgotten war in Syria etc..
So let me get this right, you want the news broadcastings to stop reporting on this missing plane after 5 days because they are just going over the same bits of information but getting the views on it from several different sources, but you would like them to carry on reporting on things like Syria and the Ukraine where it is likely that there is nothing new to report after a couple of weeks or even longer. What is there that is new to justify reports from those conflicts that hasn't already happened and been reported / commented upon?
At least with this planes disappearance, its recent and there are things happening that are new (widening search area, various differing reports that may shed new light on what happened or where it is? (was it still flying several hours after contact was lost?)
The harsh reality is that people won't tune into a news channel especially to see whats new in Syria after 18 months of fighting there but still will after a few days when a plane has vanished without explanation
Once the possible explanations have been disproved, that only leaves the impossible explanations- Sherlock Holmes
ALIENS!!!!!!!
It will turn up sooner or later. Besides, if Aliens were involved it would have involved an American airline plane carrying one or two of Tom Cruise, Harrison Ford, Nicholas Cage, etc etc.
So let me get this right, you want the news broadcastings to stop reporting on this missing plane after 5 days because they are just going over the same bits of information but getting the views on it from several different sources, but you would like them to carry on reporting on things like Syria and the Ukraine where it is likely that there is nothing new to report after a couple of weeks or even longer. What is there that is new to justify reports from those conflicts that hasn't already happened and been reported / commented upon?
At least with this planes disappearance, its recent and there are things happening that are new (widening search area, various differing reports that may shed new light on what happened or where it is? (was it still flying several hours after contact was lost?)
The harsh reality is that people won't tune into a news channel especially to see whats new in Syria after 18 months of fighting there but still will after a few days when a plane has vanished without explanation
No, you didnt get it right. Nobody said stop reporting the plane crash..im saying report it when its found..A plane has crashed into the sea...the crew and the passengers, are mostly likely dead. Whilst its catastrophic for the families, and 'interesting' for joe public, Re-hashing the same item of news for over an hour, when there is
still a war in Syria, a war, where we were almost involved, but seems to be out of the news now, as im guessing Assad is now winning..the west and Russia are at loggerheads with potential nightmare scenarios, and I watched a bunch
of people interviewed about why a crashed plane has turned..I just think its dominating the news, when there are more pressing matters.
Syria and Ukraine are just examples....theres so much going on in the world, and I just think spending over an hour discussing why a crashed plane could have turned is slightly over the top.
Its of course, the main item on BBC news as I watch it now.Thankfully, not as over the top as CNN
No, you didnt get it right. Nobody said stop reporting the plane crash..im saying report it in depth, when its found..A plane has crashed into the sea...the crew