- Jul 7, 2003
- 47,641
The police are another section of the public sector whose employees rely on a very militant trade union.
Factually wrong on more than one count, but, hey, carry on...
The police are another section of the public sector whose employees rely on a very militant trade union.
Of course we would like to have more Bobbies on the beat, in an ideal World, but they are expensive and the policing budget can only go so far.
TRY TELLING THAT TO THE STUDENDS....HAVEN'T SEEN MANY POLICE PROTESTING
In the words of one of my sons friends in the Met ' they are a complete waste of time and money and have virtually no power whatsoever'
Think the record's stuck, you obviously need a trip to surgery, to get that big chip removed from your shoulder! The thread refers to PCSO's, not the drivel you're spouting out.Its obvious that there is alot of donkey work that the police have to do and so those doing the unskilled work should get paid unskilled wages. An agricultural labourer has a very skilled job but gets paid sod all and yet a bobby on the beat a small fortune. The police need to get more intelligent people in the force and change the canteen culture. to do that you pay higher wages and give more responsibility to the few and less to those doing the donkey work. The police federation want to block this as they are an obstructive regressive trade union. On the budget side of things, the first thing has to be to stop paying out vast pensions and stop the police from retiring then getting another job at another force, thus coining in an over generous pension plus a full time salary. Also get rid of regional forces and the middle management that as a result are employed to manage umpteen different forces. As a taxpayer I want cheap bobbies/PSOs, well paid intelligent police further up the chain, and cheaper administration. Reform the police, fire service and the tube (actually lets have a DLR type tube with no drivers at all)
Has he heard what people say about the Met?
In my area the PCSOs are very well respected and have done a lot of good work. When an elderly drinking companion had not been seen for a few days, we mentioned it to a passing PCSO who with proper authority ended up climbing in through one of his windows and unfortunately found our mate dead in bed. The young woman concerned performed what turned out to be an unpleasant job with sympathy and skill. Just to correct what was said elsewhere, she is not a fat bird and was selelected from an eventual group of two PCS and two PCSOs because she was the only one small and agile enough to get through the window.
Its obvious that there is alot of donkey work that the police have to do and so those doing the unskilled work should get paid unskilled wages. An agricultural labourer has a very skilled job but gets paid sod all and yet a bobby on the beat a small fortune. The police need to get more intelligent people in the force and change the canteen culture. to do that you pay higher wages and give more responsibility to the few and less to those doing the donkey work. The police federation want to block this as they are an obstructive regressive trade union. On the budget side of things, the first thing has to be to stop paying out vast pensions and stop the police from retiring then getting another job at another force, thus coining in an over generous pension plus a full time salary. Also get rid of regional forces and the middle management that as a result are employed to manage umpteen different forces. As a taxpayer I want cheap bobbies/PSOs, well paid intelligent police further up the chain, and cheaper administration. Reform the police, fire service and the tube (actually lets have a DLR type tube with no drivers at all)
Was it a patio window she squeezed through?
Instead of getting angry you should take a step back. The police fedreation act as a trade union. They lobby and they are obstructive to change. Insulting agricultural labourers shows arrogance. Actually their job involves building, animal welfare, long hours - 24/7, heavy machinery and the list goes on. I would agree on graduates these days, a degree just about shows the candidate can read and write - and as the police pay well so someone who doesnt make it in the private sector will likely head to the police. However, what I am pointing out is that there are skilled and unskilled jobs in all industry, and the market should determine salary. There is a danger factor of course but so is there in fishing (the most dangerous occupation with being a merchant seaman). Private sector jobs do not have a lavish state funded pension scheme. The scam (at our expense) of police resigning, drawing retirement and then working for a new force is a scandal - and you know two of them! The police need a change. The canteen culture must go and they should recruit intelligent people at the top otherwise the canteen culture highlighted by The Lawrence fiasco will continue. The fact that hardly anyone (if anyone?) was not sacked for that is frankly, as a tax payer, not good enough. From top to bottom there should have been sackings. There will be many good policemen but frankly the police as an institution is old fashioned and way behind the curve. Like everything life moves on and so should the police, fire service and the tube. However the employees of these services (paid for by us) seem to think we go to work to give them a generous salary and pension, but frankly we dont and the police work for us not the other way around. As an aside, it was an ex chief of the MET that said that a successful police force recruits more honest officers than dishonest one's, and the MET was successful - just. Thet is not much of an endorsement from someone that ran the MET. So if you wont listen to us your customers then maybe listen to your boss.
Agree with the above.
People want to see more police on the streets, but half the time we end up doing stuff like guarding scenes, conducting house to house enquiries where someone's been burgled, collecting or waiting around to collect CCTV from shops. In that respect, the PCSOs have been a godsend, because they can do the scene guarding, they can pick up stuff and so on, which means the rest of us can spend less time writing and more time out. And I do think the consensus is generally that they do a good job when it comes to neighbourhood policing- attending local meetings to give briefings or provide information, being a sort of community liaison etc. I realise that is supposed to be the police's job, but if you have eight officers on duty in a city the size of Brighton, a couple of shoplifters and a domestic could mean nearly all your officers are committed on a job within a few minutes, and there's nobody left to do the local stuff because you have to have units free to deal with the next 999 call.
There are certain elements about their role that winds me right up, but on balance, I think the pros outweigh the cons, just about.
They do have different style numbers to police officers