Titus
Come on!
We were very poor and lacked guts and a will to win. Nobody deserved more than a 5 in my opinion.
Player ratings vs Carlisle?
- Thread starter goldstone
- Start date
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
the wanderbus
Well-known member
exactly, dull, dull game.If we're serious about going up next season we're going to have to learn how to break down a packed defence.
eastlondonseagull
Well-known member
How the f*** can you call that a dull game?!! We murdered them for most of it and were only really let down by the final ball and a lack of luck. We could and should have tonked them by five or six.
Some of the people on here are beginning to sound like Chelsea fans!
eastlondonseagull
Well-known member
Lacked the will to win?! Right, that's why we beseiged their goal, got a thoroughly deserved equaliser and then went straight for the winner! FFS!
Thought the boys battled excellently yesterday; they desperately wanted a win.
Titus
Come on!
It's you that is in the minority, we never looked like scoring.
Marshy
Well-known member
It certainly wasnt for lack of trying though. And i disagree the goal was coming for a good 20mins
Finchley Seagull
Well-known member
I don't think he is actually. There have been a fair number of positive comments on here and I do agree with him. The only thing I would say is it shows how much we miss Murray when he is not playing as with him in the side I think we would have hammered them. However, yesterday was far from as depressing as you seem to be saying. If you compare it to some of the home games we lost to Oldham, Stockport and others under Slade then it was a lot better.
Finchley Seagull
Well-known member
Also, 12 shots on target and numerous crosses into their box when the ball would not quite drop for us tends to disagree with you. I honestly think if we can keep the players we have signed until the end of the season and on loan, then we are a quality strike partner for Murray and a couple of players to add competition away from a top six team.
Chesney Christ
New member
Are you sure about that?
Twinkle Toes
Growing old disgracefully
I too certainly think he would've made a real difference yesterday, but unfortunately all those dumb yellow cards he accrued robbed the side of his valuable presence innit.
bhafc_ross
New member
Brezovan - 6
Hoyte - 5
Calderon - 6
Elphick - 6
El Abd - 6
Crofts - 6
Dicker - 6
Lua Lua - 6.5
Bennett - 7
Navarro - 7
Barnes - 5
Hendrie - 7
Holroyd - 6
Hoyte - 5
Calderon - 6
Elphick - 6
El Abd - 6
Crofts - 6
Dicker - 6
Lua Lua - 6.5
Bennett - 7
Navarro - 7
Barnes - 5
Hendrie - 7
Holroyd - 6
Why? My average mark is the average mark for the team, today as a whole they were a 7, so 7 is the average mark and this varies weekly, with the same average mark everytime, you can't tell the difference between them as overall, it will always work out as a 5, assuming your doing it correctly.
How the hell was yesterday a 7/10 performance as a whole?!
Someone tell me what this twit is on about?
Yesterday, incase you didn't notice we completely dominated the match for 90minutes, but failed to take our chances, conceded a good free kick and a mistake from our keeper. We dominated the game, thus it is a 7/10, I am not a believer n knocking 2 off of everyone just because we lost.
Samhale, it's basic maths. if your average every game is a 5, theres no difference match to match and you just comparing how the players played relative to each other, with a moving average you can compare overall team performances week to week. You can't compare an average of 5 with an average of 5, but can compare a 6 and then a 7.
Last edited:
Twinkle Toes
Growing old disgracefully
Call me an old fashioned pedant, but I don't know how anybody can rate the performance of every individual player over 90 minutes. Maybe some folk have 11 pairs of eyes? 
What?
If you change whatever is "average" per game, you can't compare performance by game.
If you say 5 is the mark for an 'average' performance. Then a 6 versus Carlisle is a performance equal to a 6 versus Southampton.
If you change the average every game then a 5 in one game could equate to a 8 in another game. Where is the sense in that? How can you keep track of how good performances for an individual are if the ratings definition changes each week?
An average performance should always earn the same mark. A great performance should always earn the same mark. A poor performance should earn the same mark.
The mean (and mode) average of each game will change, of course. A better performance overall will lead to everyone getting better marks because a better performance overall is a result of better indivdual performances), so the team average (mean/mode) will go up.
Last edited:
Call me an old fashioned pedant, but I don't know how anybody can rate the performance of every individual player over 90 minutes. Maybe some folk have 11 pairs of eyes?
Agreed. You can't really appreciate, say, the movement of Dicker to create space if you're busy watching LuaLua drible down the wing, etc.
portslade seagull
Well-known member
This seems a more appropiate summing up.. Hoyte looked terrified everytime the ball was passed to him and Holroyd was just Holroyd out of his depth get rid next season or loan out