Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Piers Morgan leaves GMB.







Randy McNob

> > > > > > Cardiff > > > > >
Jun 13, 2020
4,724
megan-markle-meghan-markle.gif
 






Rookie

Greetings
Feb 8, 2005
12,324
Lied about it till the last

He's finished
Absolutely no chance. He will be back on what ever channel he spouts his nonsense on and will either completely ignore this or just say the judge was lying and his little followers will lap it up.

Edit: and how predictable was that

 
Last edited:




HeaviestTed

I’m eating
NSC Patron
Mar 23, 2023
2,130
Absolutely no chance. He will be back on what ever channel he spouts his nonsense on and will either completely ignore this or just say the judge was lying and his little followers will lap it up.

Edit: and how predictable was that


It’s mental how people can get away with things and aren’t challenged on it. Quite remarkable.

Surely he isn’t the only presenter in the world? When someone has been shown to have questionable qualities why can’t he just stop getting jobs? He doesn’t need the money, let someone else do it.
 


WATFORD zero

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 10, 2003
27,776
So he lied about the phone hacking, he published faked pictures of British servicemen abusing Iraqi prisoners,

I would love it if the nasty little twat was sent down. Love it :thumbsup:

8ba48969-c911-44e2-8b65-93f139b11703.jpg
 


pb21

Well-known member
Apr 23, 2010
6,689
Seems to be a tacit acknowledgment, from the weapons grade ****, that he knew and endorsed phone hacking.
 




Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,183
Goldstone


Piers Morgan found to be a lying turd by a judge just hours after we win the Europa group?

Merry Christmas, ya filthy animals.

Just heard Morgan's statement on radio, and he made it sounds like in the 9 years he was editor (or something) there was only one story where the court ruled that information might (not was) have been obtained illegally, and he's never known how the information was obtained.

His statement seems at odds with everything else reported on the trial.

 
Last edited:


Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,183
Goldstone
Seems to be a tacit acknowledgment, from the weapons grade ****, that he knew and endorsed phone hacking.
No, in his statement he says he didn't know.
 


A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
20,553
Deepest, darkest Sussex
Just hear Morgan's statement on radio, and he made it sounds like in the 9 years he was editor (or something) there was only one story where the court ruled that information might (not was) have been obtained illegally, and he's never known how the information was obtained.

His statement seems at odds with everything else reported on the trial.

It is quite amusing that in order to deny he did anything illegal he basically has to admit to being absolutely terrible at his job
 




Happy Exile

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Apr 19, 2018
2,135


Piers Morgan found to be a lying turd by a judge just hours after we win the Europa group?

Merry Christmas, ya filthy animals.

I didn't realise he'd worked with Omid Scobie before. Looking back at the highly personal and critical way he speaks about Scobie when discussing Scobie's relationship with Harry and Meghan now makes a lot more sense. I thought it was just generalised bias and hatred alongside jealousy and a desperation for Royal recognition, but perhaps it was more because Scobie seems to have given evidence against him for hacking.
 


pb21

Well-known member
Apr 23, 2010
6,689
No, in his statement he says he didn't know.
Note sure, he says he doesn't know in regards to that particular case only, not hacking more generally:

"To be clear, I had then and still have zero knowledge of how that particular story was gathered."

And he may not know, but that doesn't mean he doesn't strongly suspect.
 


Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,183
Goldstone
Note sure, he says he doesn't know in regards to that particular case only, not hacking more generally:

His statement is trying to give the impression he didn't know and had nothing to do with anything. If the judge said that Morgan had anything to do with anything, then Morgan has tried to ignore that in his statement.
 




AmexRuislip

Retired Spy 🕵️‍♂️
Feb 2, 2014
34,773
Ruislip
His statement is trying to give the impression he didn't know and had nothing to do with anything. If the judge said that Morgan had anything to do with anything, then Morgan has tried to ignore that in his statement.
You never know. Piers M.Organ might still get a Christmas card from the NRA, inviting him to be a celebrity target for their AGM.
 










vegster

Sanity Clause
May 5, 2008
28,273
Harry's statement post trial is remarkably candid about the role of Mr Morgan and names him specifically as being implicated and that he should be investigated by the police and the Stock Exchange among others for criminality due to perjury along with Reach PLC... will it happen ? I would love to think so but sadly, the system will probably fail again.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here