Zen Frenzy
New member
Curious split in opinions.
I spoke with a fair few people about this yesterday, to a man, every fan of lower league clubs is vehemently opposed to it, and all the Chelsea, man U, Liverpool "fans" are pro.
QED
Curious split in opinions.
I spoke with a fair few people about this yesterday, to a man, every fan of lower league clubs is vehemently opposed to it, and all the Chelsea, man U, Liverpool "fans" are pro.
I expect back then Italy had fewer native players in their top league, but they did ok.England, these days, qualify for all routines, back in 72 & 76 with 95%? 'Home grown' players playing on the top flight we failed to get to the Euros & 94 World Cup USA...How did that happen!?
Curious split in opinions.
I spoke with a fair few people about this yesterday, to a man, every fan of lower league clubs is vehemently opposed to it, and all the Chelsea, man U, Liverpool "fans" are pro.
I get the feeling that the reason it might not help the England team is because the big clubs that have a B team won't need to use English players. Also, effort going into this detracts from the real problem, which does appear to be a lack of professional coaches for young players.The thing was, all the Premier fans who are pro are using the "It will develop the England team" line
If the Premiership really do believe that it will benefit youngsters to be playing against men in the lower leagues, then the simple answer is to encourage youngsters to be loaned to the lower league teams.
Maybe make rules that a player under the age of 21 should be loaned to a lower league team for absolute no cost. That sounds like a win win situation to me. B teams just have no benefit to the lower leagues.
The problem with that is that not many lower league teams are playing the same style of football as the top clubs. Just like we want our new training facility to be used to coach players in the same style as our first team, so would the top clubs want their style used for all players. So I do see the benefit of the idea for young players. The problems are that those young players don't need to be English, and also the cost to lower league sides.If the Premiership really do believe that it will benefit youngsters to be playing against men in the lower leagues, then the simple answer is to encourage youngsters to be loaned to the lower league teams.
Ah yes, but they assure me it will be a level playing field, so if and when they win and get promoted it will be fair.
NO, NO it won't you muppets, your B teams will be training with some of the most gifted players in the world, using facilities the lower league teams could only dream of, being coached by coaches earning 1 to 2 hundred grand a year not training on pitches suitable for Sunday league etc.
I'm sure the styles aren't unique to the Premiership. If they look close enough they will see some styles similar lower down the league, just not as good.The problem with that is that not many lower league teams are playing the same style of football as the top clubs. Just like we want our new training facility to be used to coach players in the same style as our first team, so would the top clubs want their style used for all players. So I do see the benefit of the idea for young players. The problems are that those young players don't need to be English, and also the cost to lower league sides.