Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] Penalty, or...

What do you give?


  • Total voters
    442
  • This poll will close: .


timbha

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
10,682
Sussex
Well Veltman regularly goes to ground under pressure to win a free-kick and often grabs the ball to emphasise clearly that he has been fouled.
Hopefully he learns from this and only does it when he is outside the box in future.
Exactly. It’s so obvious that there’s a collective laugh from Albion fans when Veltman does it. The slightest touch and down he goes (Murray used to do it but he was a bit smarter). It’s easy for a referee to give a foul when it’s in a neutral area of the pitch. But once it’s in the box the VAR forensics leap into action, determined to make their mark.
 




slartibartfast

Active member
Sep 11, 2004
384
Henfield
At the time in the stadium I was incensed! It looked a clear shove, and the little replay that they cheekily (illegally?) showed us at the time on the big screen made it look like minimal contact with the hand. I was convinced that it was a joke decision.

However - in the cold light of day, having reviewed other angles, blah de blah, and not wishing to sound like Mikel Arteta who is INCENSED every single f'ing week, I think it probably was a penalty.

However - that doesnt mean I was wrong about Everton's "tactics" , which basically consisted of lying down every five minutes to eke out time. I still think it was one of the worst games Ive seen in a long time. But the Albion had a part to play in that, ie, the sheer inability to beat any team that sits in and defends. The plot is exactly the same every week at home - opponents sit deep, the Albion huff and puff and puff and huff and dribble around and try to pass through the eye of a needle and when we do finally have a shot, blaze it haplessly high and wide of the target - then at some point (usually ) the opposition have a rare sortie up field and score, and we continue in a more panicky huff and puff and puff and huff and disappear up our own rear ends with the ball. Sometimes we get a penalty to equalise, but more usually not.

If the opposition dont score, it's a 0-0 draw. If they do score, it's a 1-1 or 0-1 . Those seem to be the options. Its like watching a gormless kid get mugged in exactly the same way every other week !
 


Uh_huh_him

Well-known member
Sep 28, 2011
12,834
At the time in the stadium I was incensed! It looked a clear shove, and the little replay that they cheekily (illegally?) showed us at the time on the big screen made it look like minimal contact with the hand. I was convinced that it was a joke decision.

However - in the cold light of day, having reviewed other angles, blah de blah, and not wishing to sound like Mikel Arteta who is INCENSED every single f'ing week, I think it probably was a penalty.

However - that doesnt mean I was wrong about Everton's "tactics" , which basically consisted of lying down every five minutes to eke out time. I still think it was one of the worst games Ive seen in a long time. But the Albion had a part to play in that, ie, the sheer inability to beat any team that sits in and defends. The plot is exactly the same every week at home - opponents sit deep, the Albion huff and puff and puff and huff and dribble around and try to pass through the eye of a needle and when we do finally have a shot, blaze it haplessly high and wide of the target - then at some point (usually ) the opposition have a rare sortie up field and score, and we continue in a more panicky huff and puff and puff and huff and disappear up our own rear ends with the ball. Sometimes we get a penalty to equalise, but more usually not.

If the opposition dont score, it's a 0-0 draw. If they do score, it's a 1-1 or 0-1 . Those seem to be the options. Its like watching a gormless kid get mugged in exactly the same way every other week !
Yeah, but Huerzeler has had 11 home games now.

He knows that 60% of the division are going to play that way when they come here, and needs to come up with something better.

Having said that the only home games against bottom half teams are West Ham and Leicester.
 


highflyer

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2016
2,607
Ah, got it. PGMOL have got a vendetta against Joel Veltman. Stockley Park has his mugshot on the wall.
I don't think it takes that level of conspiracy theory to think that referees may talk to each other, and watch videos of previous games etc. We've all been aware of Veltman's antics for years. Other fans have become far more aware this year (and they all hate him). Hardly surprising if he gets slightly more careful scrutiny as a result.

His past record would suggest that was likely deliberate. And if he'd got away with it we'd be talking about how 'clever' he is.

I think Veltman is a very good player. But I wish he'd reduce the 'clever' stuff.
 
Last edited:


METALMICKY

Well-known member
Jan 30, 2004
7,067
I don't think it takes that level of conspiracy theory to think that referees may talk to each other, and watch videos of previous games etc. We've all been aware of Veltman's antics for years. Other fans have become far more aware this year (and they all hate him). Hardly surprising if he gets slightly more careful scrutiny as a result.

His past record would suggest that was likely deliberate. And if he'd got away with it we'd be taling about how 'clever' he is.

I think Veltman is a very good player. But I wish he'd reduce the 'clever' stuff.
The ref sussed him earlier in the game when he tried the ' ooh look ref I've been pushed ' and waived play on. A decision that a smarter Joel should have noted.
 




highflyer

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2016
2,607
So he cons ref when he hasn't been shoved does he?

You are massively under-estimating him, if you think that.
Yes, he cons refs (going down very easily when he feels the slightest touch and it is tactically useful to do so) We all know it. Some like it, some don't.

I am not underestimating him. I think he's very very good at it, which is why it has taken so long for the rest of the world to realise what we've known for a few seasons.
 


Milano

Well-known member
Aug 15, 2012
4,166
Sussex but not by the sea
Yeah, but Huerzeler has had 11 home games now.

He knows that 60% of the division are going to play that way when they come here, and needs to come up with something better.

Having said that the only home games against bottom half teams are West Ham and Leicester.
You don't think Bournemouth and Newcastle will rock up and play like that? I do. Weirdly West Ham might actually be less likely to play like that now.
 


LamieRobertson

Not awoke
Feb 3, 2008
49,091
SHOREHAM BY SEA
So you've seen the reply and genuinely still believe it was a foul? I am really surprised by that and again, it shows why VAR will never fully work and why we have to accept referee's will make mistakes and decisions that lots of fans/players/managers will never agree with.

You're never going to get everyone to agree with the majority of decisions on a football pitch. To me there was absolutely nothing in that challenge, it was just really weak defending and poor decision making by Joel.
You raise done good points there

To me it was a foul and if the players were reversed (the Everton player hand balled it) I’d expect a penalty for the shove
 






dazzer6666

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Mar 27, 2013
56,548
Burgess Hill
I don't think it takes that level of conspiracy theory to think that referees may talk to each other, and watch videos of previous games etc. We've all been aware of Veltman's antics for years. Other fans have become far more aware this year (and they all hate him). Hardly surprising if he gets slightly more careful scrutiny as a result.

His past record would suggest that was likely deliberate. And if he'd got away with it we'd be talking about how 'clever' he is.

I think Veltman is a very good player. But I wish he'd reduce the 'clever' stuff.
It's more organised than having a chat - the PGMOL have their own analysts. The refs get pre-match briefings and examples on what to look out for from all teams/players. There's a current advert for one ......

 










Easy 10

Brain dead MUG SHEEP
Jul 5, 2003
62,567
Location Location
Lineker (for once) makes the most sense. Why would an experienced defender deliberately do that? Answer = he wouldn't. His arms going out are because he's going to hit the deck, it's an involuntary action.
Actually, the simplest answer to that question is - because he's a FOOTBALLER. Cheating is in their DNA, they will work absolutely any situation to try to engineer it to their advantage and push the boundaries to the limit. Particularly Veltman.

From the WSU I couldn't see the handball, and on that one quick replay we got I still wasn't sure. But having seen it on MOTD, Veltman quite clearly deliberately swipes the ball away as he is falling. It was hand to ball all day long. He had a brainfart in that moment thinking he could get away with it. As I say, its just how he and most footballers are wired.
 








American Seagle

Well-known member
Jun 14, 2022
989
Actually, the simplest answer to that question is - because he's a FOOTBALLER. Cheating is in their DNA, they will work absolutely any situation to try to engineer it to their advantage and push the boundaries to the limit. Particularly Veltman.

From the WSU I couldn't see the handball, and on that one quick replay we got I still wasn't sure. But having seen it on MOTD, Veltman quite clearly deliberately swipes the ball away as he is falling. It was hand to ball all day long. He had a brainfart in that moment thinking he could get away with it. As I say, its just how he and most footballers are wired.
You also have to remember that if not for VAR, or had it been outside the box, he would have got away with it.
That's why he did it.
 


Easy 10

Brain dead MUG SHEEP
Jul 5, 2003
62,567
Location Location
You also have to remember that if not for VAR, or had it been outside the box, he would have got away with it.
That's why he did it.
Pretty stupid to do it in the box though, when he would have known VAR would be getting forensic on his arse. By all means do a snidey swipe on the ball if its somewhere inconsequential. But risking it in the box ?? Idiotic. Zero points ensued, as did a DOG of a game. Cheers Velts.

Like most footballers though, he's wired to cheat.
 




Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
63,590
The Fatherland
Danny Murphy definitely a pen, Gary Lineker "why would Veltnam deliberately handle the ball away?"
My opinion is Veltnam felt the contact, went down expecting a foul and hit the ball to safety with his hand in a moment of madness!
Daft way to defend Veltman. Players do deliberately handle the ball.
 


bWize

Well-known member
Nov 6, 2007
1,698
Was a penalty all day long. As soon as I saw the replay it was obvious. Like another poster has mentioned it was dark arts gone wrong. I do think we need a few players like Veltman using those kind of "tactics" now and again, but not at every available opportunity. He's been over cooking it a little bit lately.

Pedro is another one... Frequently goes down far too easily looking for fouls that simply aren't there. He's had me worried on a few occasions where it looks like he's been shot with both barrels and looking like he's going to go off injured for a few months. Then just gets up like nothings happened after the ref ignores it.
 
Last edited:


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here