NoGoing off topic but this week I’ve seen a few nice clean cars with very dirty numberplates. Looks like they’ve splashed milkshake on the plate so dirt sticks to it. I’m guessing this is confuse ANPR systems? Is it legal?
NoGoing off topic but this week I’ve seen a few nice clean cars with very dirty numberplates. Looks like they’ve splashed milkshake on the plate so dirt sticks to it. I’m guessing this is confuse ANPR systems? Is it legal?
If it’s One Parking Solution, they sent me a picture 3 years ago of my car entering a car park with my number plate clearly showing. They had however doctored the photo as the font was different and the manufactures name on my number plate was not on the picture. I don’t know if Lady Seagull still helps but I would dispute it stating you do not know the driver’s identification but understand that the driver can prove he/she did not enter the car park at that time. Whatever you do,DO NOT PAY THESE SCUMBAGS. They can only enforce the “fine” by taking legal action which I suspect they won’t do.On Saturday I went to meet an old work friend at the Marina. I was aware of the two hour parking rule.
I arrived just after midday and was out with a couple of minutes or so to spare just gone 14.00
Today, a notice arrives claiming I entered the car park at 11.08, and hour earlier than I did. This is a blatant lie. It says I parked for 2 hours 57 minutes and not 1 hour 57 minutes.
So this is not just a case of wanting to get off a fine. This is a case of a false accusation being made. What to do ?
Yours,
Very Miffed of Queen's Park.
THIS!!!Just don’t pay them, they won’t take you to court.
No. The suggestion is that the ENTRY clock is set to GMT and the EXIT clock to BST. That would throw timings out by an hourI'm confused here. If the clock is set to GMT it would still record the elapsed time correctly just an hour out at begging and end.
Ok. Have about 25 parking fines from these companies dating back to 2015. I just get random letters from various legal companies threatening me. Straight in the shredder. Move on. If it’s a PCN then you need to contest or pay.Terrible advice.
Parking Eye are one of the companies that can and do take people to court.
If you want to potentially go to court, or destroy your credit rating, or answer to bailiffs asking for money multiple times what they're currently asking for - ignore the letters and refuse to pay.
Parking Eye operate for Brighton & Hove City Council. They aren't a small cowboy firm - they are a big firm that take these charges very seriously and they do pursue them, successfully.
To add to my previous post. They are bullies and most people cave inTerrible advice.
Parking Eye are one of the companies that can and do take people to court.
If you want to potentially go to court, or destroy your credit rating, or answer to bailiffs asking for money multiple times what they're currently asking for - ignore the letters and refuse to pay.
Parking Eye operate for Brighton & Hove City Council. They aren't a small cowboy firm - they are a big firm that take these charges very seriously and they do pursue them, successfully.
I’ve parked in the marina all day loads of times (when going on boat fishing trips) and never had a ticket.1) Just stop being angry and go and sort it out with Asda as they have agreed.
2) If you ignore it, Parking Eye will take you to court. Please just follow option 1.
3) Ignore the other advice on here that the Marina car park doesn't issue tickets for exceeding 4 hrs. They do as my son will testify!
Terrible advice.
Parking Eye are one of the companies that can and do take people to court.
If you want to potentially go to court, or destroy your credit rating, or answer to bailiffs asking for money multiple times what they're currently asking for - ignore the letters and refuse to pay.
Parking Eye operate for Brighton & Hove City Council. They aren't a small cowboy firm - they are a big firm that take these charges very seriously and they do pursue them, successfully.
I'm also on the Government Steering Group that has been shaping the Private Parking statutory Code of Practice since 2020. That work (unpaid but eye-opening hours of virtual meetings with the parking industry and others) was completed in 2022.
- Both ParkingEye and One Parking Solution (they are different companies) are known to litigate - as many PPCs now do - but as long as you defend, you are not risking a CCJ even if you lose, which almost nobody on MSE does. Very easy to defend. I wrote the Template Defence used on MSE and it works. I do these cases every day on MSE and I occasionally rock up in person at Brighton, Worthing or Lewes courts.
Thank you for all you do.IMHO and based on my 15 years or so of fighting PPCs, they deserve all the bad press they get. Especially firms that use ANPR without bothering to do sufficient checks.
IT'S NOT A FVCKING FINE !!!!!!Don't you get four hours free parking at the Marina Car Park (the one above the cinema)? You should just pay the fine imho for the shame of being so close and yet so far from ample free parking time.
Sounds like you devoted much of your life’s work to this. A great cause which I’m sure has helped so many along the way! ThanksGood post above. As are most of the replies.
Some of you know and it's no secret that I'm Coupon-mad on MSE (author of the MSE NEWBIES sticky thread and the Template court defence thread there).
I've never lost a case when speaking as a lay rep for Defendants in court v private parking companies (PPCs).
A bit of background:
I'm also on the Government Steering Group that has been shaping the Private Parking statutory Code of Practice since 2020. That work (unpaid but eye-opening hours of virtual meetings with the parking industry and others) was completed in 2022. But then it was cynically blocked by the moneymen - PPCs & their pet debt crawlers - via Judicial Reviews. The JRs were basically funded by tens of thousands of clueless victims who pay, thinking they have a fine (sigh...it is just an unsolicited invoice).
The statutory Code is not dead; just waiting on Angela Rayner's MHCLG now to finalise it. The 'joint Code' trumpeted last month on BBC news is NOT it! That's a cleverly timed but IMHO cynical smoke & mirrors attempt by the two rival Trade Bodies, who colluded to create a watered down version. I suspect in the hope of hoodwinking Labour Ministers in the MHCLG to just run with that version.
Errr. No. Won't happen on my watch.
Anyhoo...
My take on this one:
- ParkingEye have clearly set one camera clock an hour out when doing some maintenance that day. Unusual but I've seen this error before - from NCP - and I kicked up a stink to the British Parking Association: all PCNs on the date affected were quashed. The explanation was exactly as some have guessed: one ANPR camera is synched to BST and the other to -1 hour. A maintenance issue at this site, soon spotted. I reckon ParkingEye already know about this.
- complaining to Asda is the right first step. With any private PCN, landowner complaint is always 'PLAN A' before even thinking about the farce the industry call 'appeal'.
- getting this in the Argus is a great idea. Jody Doherty-Cove has written articles about PPCs before. Mainly about One Parking Solution due to them being local. He might still be at the Argus? They might well print a piece about this. It would be good to expose it because some saps (and Lease firms or Fleet Managers) will have stupidly just paid, like it's a fine. Daft but true.
- Many PPCs do sue people. Don't shred the letters. DO IGNORE PPC DEBT CRAWLERS - A COMPLETE WASTE OF SPACE. But open all letters to check for a court claim form. Tell them if you move house, of course, and always update your V5C address, not just your driving licence.
- Both ParkingEye and One Parking Solution (they are different companies) are known to litigate - as many PPCs now do - but as long as you defend, you are not risking a CCJ even if you lose, which almost nobody on MSE does. Very easy to defend. I wrote the Template Defence used on MSE and it works. I do these cases every day on MSE and I occasionally rock up in person at Brighton, Worthing or Lewes courts.
But this one will be easy to cancel.
I would love to see this story in the Argus though. The PPC industry is considered by MPs, Motoring groups and those in the know to be rotten to the core.
IMHO and based on my 15 years or so of fighting PPCs, they deserve all the bad press they get. Especially firms that use ANPR without bothering to do sufficient checks.
This issue should have been spotted BEFORE harvesting hundreds of Asda shoppers' DVLA data that day. The sheer numbers will have been huge.
They had no reasonable cause to get your data.
Go for it, OP!
It isn’t often you come across a real life super hero, this is amazing work! Thank you.Good post above. As are most of the replies.
Some of you know and it's no secret that I'm Coupon-mad on MSE (author of the MSE NEWBIES sticky thread and the Template court defence thread there).
I've never lost a case when speaking as a lay rep for Defendants in court v private parking companies (PPCs).
A bit of background:
I'm also on the Government Steering Group that has been shaping the Private Parking statutory Code of Practice since 2020. That work (unpaid but eye-opening hours of virtual meetings with the parking industry and others) was completed in 2022. But then it was cynically blocked by the moneymen - PPCs & their pet debt crawlers - via Judicial Reviews. The JRs were basically funded by tens of thousands of clueless victims who pay, thinking they have a fine (sigh...it is just an unsolicited invoice).
The statutory Code is not dead; just waiting on Angela Rayner's MHCLG now to finalise it. The 'joint Code' trumpeted last month on BBC news is NOT it! That's a cleverly timed but IMHO cynical smoke & mirrors attempt by the two rival Trade Bodies, who colluded to create a watered down version. I suspect in the hope of hoodwinking Labour Ministers in the MHCLG to just run with that version.
Errr. No. Won't happen on my watch.
Anyhoo...
My take on this one:
- ParkingEye have clearly set one camera clock an hour out when doing some maintenance that day. Unusual but I've seen this error before - from NCP - and I kicked up a stink to the British Parking Association: all PCNs on the date affected were quashed. The explanation was exactly as some have guessed: one ANPR camera is synched to BST and the other to -1 hour. A maintenance issue at this site, soon spotted. I reckon ParkingEye already know about this.
- complaining to Asda is the right first step. With any private PCN, landowner complaint is always 'PLAN A' before even thinking about the farce the industry call 'appeal'.
- getting this in the Argus is a great idea. Jody Doherty-Cove has written articles about PPCs before. Mainly about One Parking Solution due to them being local. He might still be at the Argus? They might well print a piece about this. It would be good to expose it because some saps (and Lease firms or Fleet Managers) will have stupidly just paid, like it's a fine. Daft but true.
- Many PPCs do sue people. Don't shred the letters. DO IGNORE PPC DEBT CRAWLERS - A COMPLETE WASTE OF SPACE. But open all letters to check for a court claim form. Tell them if you move house, of course, and always update your V5C address, not just your driving licence.
- Both ParkingEye and One Parking Solution (they are different companies) are known to litigate - as many PPCs now do - but as long as you defend, you are not risking a CCJ even if you lose, which almost nobody on MSE does. Very easy to defend. I wrote the Template Defence used on MSE and it works. I do these cases every day on MSE and I occasionally rock up in person at Brighton, Worthing or Lewes courts.
But this one will be easy to cancel.
I would love to see this story in the Argus though. The PPC industry is considered by MPs, Motoring groups and those in the know to be rotten to the core.
IMHO and based on my 15 years or so of fighting PPCs, they deserve all the bad press they get. Especially firms that use ANPR without bothering to do sufficient checks.
This issue should have been spotted BEFORE harvesting hundreds of Asda shoppers' DVLA data that day. The sheer numbers will have been huge.
They had no reasonable cause to get your data.
Go for it, OP!
Who needs the Citizens Advice Bureau when you've got NSCIt isn’t often you come across a real life super hero, this is amazing work! Thank you.