[Other Sport] Paris 2024 Olympics & Paralympics ***Official Match Thread***

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊







Dave the hatosaurus

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2021
1,438
worthing
I don't remember them bashing long balls in the air in hockey before. This seems incredibly dangerous
Many moons ago i used to be a hockey umpire and when i started the lifted ball was completely banned. When the game moved from grass to astro several rules were changed over the years. By the time i stopped and hung up my whistle the then laws meant you could lift a ball forward so long as any player was not within 5 yards and also anyone who was receiving/intercepting a lifted pass could not be tackled while in that process, thus reducing the danger.
Whether that is still the case i do not know.
 










gazingdown

Well-known member
Feb 26, 2011
1,071
Many moons ago i used to be a hockey umpire and when i started the lifted ball was completely banned. When the game moved from grass to astro several rules were changed over the years. By the time i stopped and hung up my whistle the then laws meant you could lift a ball forward so long as any player was not within 5 yards and also anyone who was receiving/intercepting a lifted pass could not be tackled while in that process, thus reducing the danger.
Whether that is still the case i do not know.

That’s still the rule for aerials.

You can lift with people within 5 but as long as safe (i.e. they’re not right in front of you)

Receiving player must be given 5yds to control/bring down the ball. The key(for the umpire) is who the receiving player is (the one moving the least is probably a good bet). If in doubt, decision goes against the team performing the aerial.

When I play in defence (Im normally a striker but played a lot of defence too) I used to do aerials all the time (sometimes successfully! :D). As a forward, more about receiving the ball well.
 


herecomesaregular

We're in the pipe, 5 by 5
Oct 27, 2008
4,649
Still in Brighton
Don't really get the criticism of the BBC here. If you want to "choose" what events you particularly want to watch (there's many events on apparently!) you have to pay for Discovery+ and Eurosport. The BBC hasn't the budget and the Olympics isn't protected like the WC. I've been quite happy flicking between the two live streams on iplayer. Accept that or pay up.
 


A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
20,523
Deepest, darkest Sussex
Not sure which is more nauseating, the Simone Biles fawning at this Olympics or the Lionel Messi fawning at the last World Cup

Like yeah she’s probably the greatest ever, no need to keep going on about it
 








A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
20,523
Deepest, darkest Sussex
Murray / Evans on, much better start than the other night!
 




vegster

Sanity Clause
May 5, 2008
28,272
Worse ever coverage , nothing live , no scores being given , it really is awful , GB with a chance of a bronze , but you would not know
Every time I turn on its facking swimming..so fudging boring.
 








vegster

Sanity Clause
May 5, 2008
28,272
Loving the swimming, awesome. The BBC commentary duo match the occasion. :love:
Put a couple of hungry Great White's in that pool and then you would get some truly awesome swimming.
 




Weststander

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2011
69,240
Withdean area
Put a couple of hungry Great White's in that pool and then you would get some truly awesome swimming.

World class swimmers are supreme athletes and many nations are great in the sport making it so competitive with some rivalries. All the way back to Mark Spitz in 72, I’ve loved Olympic swimming.

And the BBC just do it so well. Starting in my time with the great Alan Weekes.
 


JamesAndTheGiantHead

Well-known member
Sep 2, 2011
6,349
Worthing
The American media think they’re winning.
IMG_8744.jpeg
Going to come as quite a shock when they find out they’re 6th.
 








Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top