Well the '99.9999999% of victims' quote didn't hammer it home. It was so obviously bollox!
Er, yes it did, and the point wasn't.
Well the '99.9999999% of victims' quote didn't hammer it home. It was so obviously bollox!
Funny you say that as I covered this topic in class today with a group of teens. They collectively came to the conclusion that approaching a women in public to ask her out (in a bar, cafe etc) is unacceptable.
Coming from the 80's nightclubbing period it could have been carnage with harassment claims. Basically Most mainstream clubs would have 20 mins of ' slowies' whereby blokes would circle the dancefloor before requesting a slow dance from gaggles of girls who would be disappointed if they never got asked. The worst the bloke might face would be the ' walk back to the pavilion' and hoots of derision from his mates.
I just thought your keyboard was broken.This is all pretty horrifying stuff, and while my "99.999999% of victims" quote was designed to just hammer a point home, the point stills stands
Well, it sort of remotely is...
The Crime Survey for England and Wales estimated that 20% of women and 4% of men have experienced some type of sexual assault since the age of 16, equivalent to an estimated 3.4 million female victims and 631,000 male victims. That means that 84% of crimes were suffered by women.
Of the crimes suffered by men, fewer than 0.1% of men had experienced rape or assault by penetration. This trend is not the same for women.
By gender, females are most likely to experience sexual assault between the ages of 10-19. For males it is 5-14.
This is all pretty horrifying stuff, and while my "99.999999% of victims" quote was designed to just hammer a point home, the point stills stands - women experience far more cases of sexual harassment and crime than men.
As previously mentioned, if you match with a woman on tinder she has contributed to the 2 way consent of attraction. If you approach her in a coffee shop she has not. That is the theory btw and not my opinion.
And, yes, I would say we already have a socially awkward tech generation.
Women wear perfume to smell good and attract compliments. If they didn’t want compliments they’d just have a quick squirt of toilet duck.
Be pretty creepy not to get 7/7 tho eh? No 'management training' required. Hopefully.
It does make sense though. A good female friend of mine was, whilst in a relationship, asked out by a guy in a bookstore. She politely declined and continued to browse before realising he was never more than a metre away. He followed her around some shops before she confronted him. He kept telling her how beautiful she was and that she ‘wanted him really’ and was just ‘playin hard to get’. She had to phone her boyfriend to come and meet her, when he arrived the creep surprisingly disappeared. This guy was in his 30s and in a suit, not your generic creepy lowlife.
Whilst of course singular anecdotal situations don’t necessarily count as the norm it isn’t always as ‘rom commy’ as it sounds.
I personally met my longtime girlfriend on tinder, and the majority of my friends in relationships met their friends online, mostly tinder, too. (That’s not to say tinder is perfect or safe by any means)
You are right that some guys do not seem to read the signals. Shame we have lost that 'eyes across a room' connection but maybe that is a bit old school idealistic.
but I'd never think it was acceptable to compliment a women's perfume at work.
Thank God I have no need to date anymore, FFS.......
[/B]
yeah, this thread is well depressing
I think so but likewise a few of my female friends have said they would love to be approached a bit more often in a cafe or a pub. I guess the key as a guy is that if she is clearly not interested then accept it and move on.
I think so but likewise a few of my female friends have said they would love to be approached a bit more often in a cafe or a pub. I guess the key as a guy is that if she is clearly not interested then accept it and move on.
Yup!
Senior admin manager who is grossly overweight ( let's call her Natasha)