Ostigard left Stoke went on loan to Napoli, who then agreed a fee of up to £10m (rumoured) based on a number of targets. Winning the Italian league may have triggered most of those, although I am not sure if he has made enough starting appearances yet.Can't agree that Stoke look "dumb". Unless of course you think we look dumb because we binned off prolific Viktor Gykores because Aaron Connolly looked a player. That looked a good decision for approximately three games. Sometimes these things happen eh?
And as for our club rejecting Ian Wright who went on to score a hateful for our arch rivals before becoming Arsenal's record goalscorer, I doubt that'll ever be beaten. It made WBA's decision to let Steve Bull go to Wolves look shrewd.
Stoke on the other hand are languishing in the lower half of the Championship, sacked O'Neil and despite having possibly the wealthiest owners in the Championship, are not showing any signs of progressing. Borrowing a player of obvious quality for a season and then deciding not to use him, only makes sense if you make a success of things.
Gykores from memory did not set the world alight on loan at Coventry and it did appear they were unsure if they did want to keep him. He has subsequently developed into a top Championship striker. We still don't have a vacancy for a top Championship striker, as far as I am aware.
Ian Wright? Whatever!