Pavilionaire
Well-known member
- Jul 7, 2003
- 31,273
I think Chris would take the Southampton job if offered. The only thing is with us he had good defenders to work with, but Southampton's are rubbish.
I think Chris would take the Southampton job if offered. The only thing is with us he had good defenders to work with, but Southampton's are rubbish.
Code:
Not sure Thunderbolts sources are very reliable in this instance.
The Irish national team would be a no brainer for everyone concerned if and when the vacancy occurs.
Chris could make them better..
I think he left Lewis Dunk a better player than he found him. Certainly a less reckless defender than he found him.
Chris could make them better..
I think he left Lewis Dunk a better player than he found him. Certainly a less reckless defender than he found him.
In the comments section of the Southampton Daily Echo someone has suggested that Chris Hughton takes over the ailing South Coast Club. If Chris happens to be aware of this here is my advice - DON’T!
In fact for the sake of your sanity, your health, your general well being avoid this like the proverbial plague. Put your feet up, look forward to Christmas and enjoy yourself - don’t go anywhere near that poisoned chalice.
Although it's now clear there was still more in the tank.
Well, it's all hypothetical but that's what I got out of the thread too. It's not people saying don't touch CH - it's people expressing that Saints would be an awful choice for him.
Absolute hiding to nothing TBF. Dreadful players at the back and not much going forward, apart from Ings, and Ward-Prowse from set pieces. At best he'd tighten up the defence by imposing a shape that protected the awful rearguard with the other players in the team and ground out draws and 1-0s. At worst he'd do that anyway, it wouldn't work and they'd go down. He'd start off in a worse position that he was in with us.
It's not often I agree with [MENTION=33329]Jolly Red Giant[/MENTION] but if there is a PL vacancy coming up that CH is suited to then it's definitely West Ham. .
Without wasting my time trawling NSC, I can't think of a single poster who hates Hughton.
J
Murray 17 is misquoting what I posted. I don't have any sources, but my opinion was that Chris had his contract paid up, so doesnt need to find work. He won't exactly be short of a bob or two.
There's a difference between wanting to work, and needing to work.
There were obviously people who didn't like the football played under him and who wanted him to go, but agreed he was, I think, universally respected.
And in terms of whether or not he might take the Saints job:
1. There isn't a vacancy yet...…. and
2. If there were and he was in the frame, I think he has enough savvy to make up his own mind.
I'm a bit surprised you agree. Wet Sham have grand ambitions, have spent silly money, and expect to sell out the Olympic stadium. They are looking at Europe. If Pellagringo is shipped out, they will be after Young and Thrusting, not another sexigenarian.
If I were an Iron, I'd see a CH appointment as an admission that the club have given up the season and are fire fighting against a relegation (with players probably leaving at Christmas - that young England international for starters). I really don't think they think they are in that place.
Stains, however.....nobody has mentioned yet Redmond and Bertrand. They ought to be salvable and as others have mentioned, some of the fans seem to want CH.
Anyway the club seem committed to Ralph Husenhuesnhuttlehuttel. Don't write the soppy-haired German off yet.
Look at their managerial history - Big Sam, Moyes. CH is better than both IMHO
Look at their managerial history - Big Sam, Moyes. CH is better than both IMHO