Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] Oh Bart !!



Flounce

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Nov 15, 2006
4,254
It's a flukey ricochet just like the 3rd Athens at home goal was when Steel was in goal and used his hands.

Sometimes it's just bad luck when you are a keeper
Bet Burnley fans wish Trafford had been in goal today :lolol:

For once we got lucky at the other end of the pitch, if their keeper hadn’t made that howler we’d have lost.

Blaming Bart for us being so shit is missing the point. We were not winning that game from open play or a set piece even if Bart had saved the goal
 




Greg Bobkin

Silver Seagull
May 22, 2012
16,028
Context is everything. Then I wrote “but” ironically, but you’re probably too dim to know that 😂. Bart f***ed up we all know that. He’s made you Bart bum boys look stupid.
Er, OK then.

:shrug:
 










Papa Lazarou

Living in a De Zerbi wonderland
Jul 7, 2003
19,357
Worthing
It would have been a handling offence due to the back pass, hence the reason for going with his feet
Until I read this thread that aspect hasn't occurred to me at all. However it's clear that Bart couldn't use his hands.
 


BadFish

Huge Member
Oct 19, 2003
18,194
So I get called all manner of things for a genuine post and you pick me up on one thing which I didn’t mean in that way ? Laughable.

My guess is you got infraction points for homoohobia (quite rightly too). Of course it's time we adrressed womble discrimination in all its forms, so hopefully this will get added to the infractions list too... But it may take time.
 
Last edited:






Washie

Well-known member
Jun 20, 2011
6,052
Eastbourne
Sorry, but I’m not seeing your point.

You think he can’t have picked the ball up, I get that. But what’s the issue with him using his hands or body to block the ball with the attacker coming down on him?

Or you don’t think it was an error?
No, he could not have used his hands. Also, with him bearing down on goal like that, if he had used his hands, it could have been classed as denying an obvious goal scoring opportunity. With no penalty awarded, Bart could have been sent off.
 


METALMICKY

Well-known member
Jan 30, 2004
6,823
Sorry, but I’m not seeing your point.

You think he can’t have picked the ball up, I get that. But what’s the issue with him using his hands or body to block the ball with the attacker coming down on him?

Or you don’t think it was an error?
We don't "think" we know he can't pick ball up! How does he block the ball with his hands exactly and it's not hand ball?

Would it be not far easier for you to just admit you simply forgot the rule that he can't pick up the back pass?
 


Garyoldfan

Well-known member
Jun 14, 2023
591
Everybody needs to be honest here. If Steele had let a goal in like that you’d all be moaning and that’s a fact. Cowards.
 






Eeyore

Colonel Hee-Haw of Queen's Park
NSC Patron
Apr 5, 2014
25,901
So I get called all manner of things for a genuine post and you pick me up on one thing which I didn’t mean in that way ? Laughable.
Some of us have managed thousands of posts without using inappropriate insults, and only insulting in jest, It can be done.
 
Last edited:


Kalimantan Gull

Well-known member
Aug 13, 2003
13,436
Central Borneo / the Lizard
Everybody needs to be honest here. If Steele had let a goal in like that you’d all be moaning and that’s a fact. Cowards.

Yes, we would. I think Bart has a long way to go, but the potential to be better than Steele is clear. I think playing Steele so much has been very clever, it showed us the alternative. Because you're right, if Bart played every week and made some of these mistakes every game he'd be getting pelters. But as we've suffered Steele we know the alternative is no better, and this gives Bart time to grow without being over criticised.
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here