Razzoo
Well-known member
What happens if all 20 clubs in the premier league are well-managed?
I guess the three least well managed clubs would drop? (I know the actual truth isn't as black and white as that really)
What happens if all 20 clubs in the premier league are well-managed?
Thought this thread was worth a bounce with some updated numbers including those teams for season 20/21, our 4th in the Premier League.
That's 40% of the last 10 years in the Premier League to Leeds 10%
But their big club status is there for all to see with a massive 4 seasons in the Premier League in the last 20. HUGE.
I still find it really interesting that only 7 teams have managed to stay in the Premier League for the whole 10 years - it really illustrates how hard it is to consolidate.
Do you think this indicates that consolidation is a 20 year project? Looking at WHU/NU/Scummers as evidence? Still doesn't exclude having a mare of a season but with swift(ish) returns.
Everyone except the top 7 has missed at least 1 of the last 10 years in the premier league. To gain promotion and stay for 10 straight years is a completely unrealistic expectation. That is an average of 4 years outside of the premier league for the other 13 teams, it will be a difficult decade to navigate
Is our target to better that within the next 5 seasons?
Very interesting. Is their an easy way of finding all clubs that have played in the Premier league and their years in it ? Appreciate may not be easy but I think your brain is a lot bigger than mine !
Everyone except the top 7 has missed at least 1 of the last 10 years in the premier league. To gain promotion and stay for 10 straight years is a completely unrealistic expectation. That is an average of 4 years outside of the premier league for the other 13 teams, it will be a difficult decade to navigate
Nope, watch the interview with Bloom he is quite aware of how hard it is going to be to become a top ten club, as he says the road to it may well include relegation and return, but the club needs a challenging long term goal.
There's a fallacy here - simply that the more years a club spends in the Premier League, the more money it accumulates.
But some clubs are spending all the money they get in on player wages and agents' fees, so far from building up a healthy transfer/wages kitty, they are increasing their debts. Bournemouth are an example, five years in the Premier League, £70m owed to other clubs in transfer fees and now they're in the Championship without even a stadium or training ground to show for it. P*rtsm**th were the extreme - seven seasons, two administrations and down to L2.
The increase in the value of the TV deals also makes recent seasons far more relevant in the whole scheme of things. £100m a season is a hefty amount to play with, even compared to the £30m that clubs got ten years ago. Clubs such as Burnley who resist the temptation to blow it all and still stay up comfortably are to be congratulated. I'd also say that Norwich, who were promoted ahead of schedule and decided to bank a lot of the money for the seasons to come, have made a decision to be respected. They nearly went bust after their previous relegation and have learned the lesson. .
Would you rather a free transfer on £100k a week than a £17m transfer fee on AJ or Locadia we'll likely never recover?On the other hand it also protects us from signing players on £100K a week that we’d be lumbered with if we got relegated. See Sunderland and more recently Stoke.
Very interesting. Is their an easy way of finding all clubs that have played in the Premier league and their years in it ? Appreciate may not be easy but I think your brain is a lot bigger than mine !