Bold Seagull
strong and stable with me, or...
Shocking to you but there can't be anything more personal than music so who are you to say what should and shouldn't be included? Personally, I've never liked Led Zep but the orthodox view is that their music has to be included in any top 100 whereas I'm sure enough of my own musical tastes to stick in Apollo 440's Electroglide in Blue as one of my essential albums. That's not me being clever, that's me saying that I must have played that album a thousand times and is an essential part of my life.
To be honest whole albums of the Beatles leave me feeling nothing. I don't think it's dated at all well for the most part.
BTW - Norman Cook was born in 1963.
Okay, Cook would have been 3. Of course music is personal, but this thread isn't [MENTION=5200]Buzzer[/MENTION]'s essential 100 albums, its a list of 100 essential albums. You can be objective and not like say Revolver, but still realise it is a seminal moment in music history. I also struggle with Led Zep, but can understand why they are recognised as so influential. I like Apollo 440 too, but included in a list of 100 albums of all time!? No way, not even close. May well make your personal list of 100 favourite albums, but in the context of the history of popular music, that makes the top 100!? Not a chance.
The Beatles hasn't dated well - christ on a bike, listen to Oasis, The Jam, The Stone Roses, Blur, Pulp, The Verve, Radiohead, Franz Ferdinand, U2, Chemical Brothers (Setting Sun is pretty much a cover of Tomorrow Never Knows) the Beatles is in them all, they are still probably the most influential popular musicians of all time.