In spite of what some seem to think, there is no prize for 'winning' NSC and never has been. (Unless of course there is and I've just been particularly unlucky, spectacularly rubbish or both. Even a book token once in a while would have been nice ffs).
Anyway, having said that, it feels to me that there is a small handful of chums who seem hell-bent on carpet-bombing certain threads until everybody else dies of boredom or slips quietly out the back, never to return. If that's what victory looks like, err, well done. PM Bozza for your book tokens.
@hart's shirt recently pretty much summed up how I feel on this when he posted:
"Occasionally I feel certain threads should have suggested maximum daily posting limits for users to protect themselves and others, and for NSC unity. It's usually where there's more heat than light generated, a lack of civility shown to other contributors, or where a few monopolize the discussion. Ideally it should be a self-imposed restraint as I always like to think most people on NSC would know when they're close to stepping over the line. It is possible to robustly argue and fundamentally disagree whilst remaining civil, courteous and respectful of differing opinions.
At times like these, it's much more important that we are useful than just being right."
TL;DR?
Look, you know when you're being an arse. We all do. So please, if you think you're monopolizing the discussion or being a bit of tit, chances are that your are; so just log off for a bit.
Anyway, having said that, it feels to me that there is a small handful of chums who seem hell-bent on carpet-bombing certain threads until everybody else dies of boredom or slips quietly out the back, never to return. If that's what victory looks like, err, well done. PM Bozza for your book tokens.
@hart's shirt recently pretty much summed up how I feel on this when he posted:
"Occasionally I feel certain threads should have suggested maximum daily posting limits for users to protect themselves and others, and for NSC unity. It's usually where there's more heat than light generated, a lack of civility shown to other contributors, or where a few monopolize the discussion. Ideally it should be a self-imposed restraint as I always like to think most people on NSC would know when they're close to stepping over the line. It is possible to robustly argue and fundamentally disagree whilst remaining civil, courteous and respectful of differing opinions.
At times like these, it's much more important that we are useful than just being right."
TL;DR?
Look, you know when you're being an arse. We all do. So please, if you think you're monopolizing the discussion or being a bit of tit, chances are that your are; so just log off for a bit.