Mr Bridger
Sound of the suburbs
its a wonder to me that we have gone 50 posts and nobody has yet blamed Thatcher for this
Little edit there for you
its a wonder to me that we have gone 50 posts and nobody has yet blamed Thatcher for this
Owning a 1.5m flat in London and a 1m house in Barbados seems pretty luxurious to me.
I'll ask again, how do you square doing more with cutting the budget? You said yourself the agency could have done more. So how do you square this?
Got to the bottom of the problem there I see.
It's not just about money, it's about devising a plan by consulting the experts, then costing the plan, then implementing it.
The government have thrown short-term money at flooding by hiring in dredging plant and machinery, this having already sold the publicly-owned dredging plant and machinery at a fraction of the cost a few years earlier.
It's amazing that people will berate BG for his posts, when there are these constant political "point scoring threads" on a football message board. Going off topic, can be amusing, entertaining and interesting, but soap box spouting about one's political preferences can become incredibly boring. Perhaps Bozza could introduce a "Political Jousting" section, where all this twaddle could be isolated.
It's amazing that people will berate BG for his posts, when there are these constant political "point scoring threads" on a football message board. Going off topic, can be amusing, entertaining and interesting, but soap box spouting about one's political preferences can become incredibly boring. Perhaps Bozza could introduce a "Political Jousting" section, where all this twaddle could be isolated.
Owning a 1.5m flat in London and a 1m house in Barbados seems pretty luxurious to me.
That's not going to happen is it. Bozza is one of the main instigators of the boring, political point scoring on here.
They're building a big new flood defence scheme too.
Agree in spades but it is his business to do what he wants with, thereby setting an example to all.
Got to the bottom of the problem there I see.
It's the government's job to keep us safe and secure. And they have wilfully neglected the flood defences.
And the government have done neither up north. As I said, wilful neglect. You can bet your bottom dollar if this happened in the South, in a Tory voting or marginal area Cameron would have done more. Oh.........
Yeah.....the politics of envy again.
Anyway, reduction in spending on flood defences, or reduction in NHS spending? Your call..........or if neither of these is palateable to you, where would you reduce spending that we cannot afford?
As I said in my original response, yawn
You mean that it is similar to what Silliband threatened when Labour announced they would cancel a whole raft of road building projects in the south in their election manifesto? Including the A27 upgrades. Works both ways you know.
Anyway, reduction in spending on flood defences, or reduction in NHS spending? Your call..........or if neither of these is palateable to you, where would you reduce spending that we cannot afford?
How about not cutting taxes for millionaires or how about companies paying their fare share of tax which would then pay for adequate flood defences ?