Cheeky Monkey
Well-known member
- Jul 17, 2003
- 23,884
I did realise at the time of posting, I just couldn’t be bothered to change it.Wrong Jason, it was Flemyng that had that line.
I did realise at the time of posting, I just couldn’t be bothered to change it.Wrong Jason, it was Flemyng that had that line.
I'm not disputing their right, clearly they can..and they have. My point was more about Sunak's mandate....just like the previous lot had not mandate from the electorate to carry out their disasterous budget.The PM is whoever has the confidence of the commons.
I don't like the current Conservative party but their MPs are entirely within their rights to select whoever they like as their leader.
Let's see how they cock up next
If he was an ice cream he would lick himself to death.Peston babbling incoherently outside Number 10 on ITV lunchtime news is worth a watch
I love the way Ian Hislop on HIGNFY christened her NutellaI reckon she’s nuts and shouldn’t be anywhere near a position of authority.
One thing you can be absolutely certain of.I'm not disputing their right, clearly they can..and they have. My point was more about Sunak's mandate....just like the previous lot had not mandate from the electorate to carry out their disasterous budget.
And let's not forget even the party members did not want Sunak......for whatever reason that might be?
Yes, it's not ideal that a couple of hundred MPs get to choose the next PM, but at least they had to get elected to that position so it's considerably more democratic than it being decided by a few thousand people who've done no more than pay a membership fee, some of who wouldn't even qualify to vote in a UK GE.well not really. 200 odd MPs representing their constituents. thats the idea of representitive democracy.
Has to be said that Corbyn did give Johnson the GE he wanted when Labour were polling in the mid 20s. Although I think that was more to do with Corbyn and Momentum's delusion than any sort of democratic integrity.One thing you can be absolutely certain of.
If the roles were reversed and say Starmer is ousted with pitiful ratings 2 years out from a GE, with a new labour leader assuming PM, there's simply no way they would hold the "GE in the national interest" they call for today.
They're both duplicitous in this respect. Gaining power and holding onto it will always trump any fake moral argument (that's only real intent is to gain power and hold onto it!)
Yeah if you change the entire meaning of the word...Yes, it's not ideal that a couple of hundred MPs get to choose the next PM, but at least they had to get elected to that position so it's considerably more democratic than it being decided by a few thousand people who've done no more than pay a membership fee, some of who wouldn't even qualify to vote in a UK GE.
Might have mistaken him for Michael Green.Not been following the Tory infighting, but did he just completely blank Grant Shapps on arriving at Tory HQ? Think it was Shapps.
Unless you're planning on having elections every time we have a budget, that's just a fact of life. Any government can change their policies once they're in power, whether for good reasons like a changing economic climate, or bad reasons like the chancellor being sacked and replaced with a drooling incompetent moron. With this lot it's the same shit, different orifice.I'm not disputing their right, clearly they can..and they have. My point was more about Sunak's mandate....just like the previous lot had not mandate from the electorate to carry out their disasterous budget.
And let's not forget even the party members did not want Sunak......for whatever reason that might be?
Not been following the Tory infighting, but did he just completely blank Grant Shapps on arriving at Tory HQ? Think it was Shapps.
Well, bearing in mind that Labour's 'Best Man for the Job' might well have been Diane Abbott, perhaps not surprising.Fair enough, I just find it interesting that you assert that the Tory members essentially will not "vote for a darkie", but the best man for the job of Labour leader has always literally been a man. And white. Is it just a freak happening that someone with dark skin and/or female has never been the best person to lead the Labour Party?
I've been on the verge of launching stuff at the Radio or whatever screen for weeks now - It's all they talk about, the part, the next election etc etc. They have no integrity whatsoever. On the subject of Sunak, he seems to be getting some good press as he's kind of dapper, well spoken and brown skinned. He has horrendous ideas on how to deal with immigration and redistribution of wealth. He's a weapon grade ***t.Apparently he addressed his colleagues and warned about an existential threat faced by the Conservative Party. Good to see his priorities already in order. Don't worry about the existantial threats to the planet, to the United Kingdom, to the economy, or to democracy. Let's make sure the Conservative Party is alright.
Altogether now Pete! Meet the new boss...
Better to hug than shake hands with then.To be fair I wouldn’t hug Hancock. He looks like he shoves his fingers up his own arse.