Compared to £840 for Sky... seems like reasonable value to me.
So, just beacuse you don't want to watch something, then no-one else does ? I don't watch many of the footie games either, but some people will want to, it's their choice. I don't know how old you are, but you preferred it when the only live game you ever saw on TV was the cup final ? I don't know if you like the prem, but if you do, Sky has basically paid for all the top players to be here, without it I doubt we'd have a league in the top 5 in Europe - given that we'd have mostly British players playing here. I don't like Murdoch and wouldn't dream of buying any of his papers - mainly beacuse they're crap IMO, but I don't have a problem with Sky - I choose to pay for it.
Wish it wasn't on the BBC at all, it ruins Sundays.
According to sky editor on thieir comments page races will be shown uninterruped -no adverts thank christ.i was pissed off when channel 4 lost the england test matches. that 2005 ashes series was incredible on C4... but then so were the 2 ashes series that have been since then and channel 4 coverage was soon forgotten about.
it'll be the same with BBC. Sky are probably lining up Jake and Martin Brundle to continue anyway along with eddie and david coulthard. the only downside is the adverts, just hope theres none in the race!
Sky have done a lot for sport and its a case of the rich getting richer again. but thats life.
I'm absolutely livid.
I don't have Sky, I never had Sky and I never will have Sky.
No sport is safe when Sky want it and it seems everything has its price... but if people didn't subscribe they wouldn't have the money to buy up everything.
I love the F1 coverage from BBC, it was one of the bastions of premier sport that Sky didn't have a handle on.
Utter fucksticks!
There are so many people on here banging on about SKY....probably a lot of bullshitters as they have SKY in their house....
Sky will destory this, just like they have done the golf. The Masters coverage from them thisyear was an embarrassment, the Saturday and Sunday on the BBC was much better. In general, the BBC are much better at presenting a sports programme. Also Where is this going to fit into sky's schedule, what with all the other live sports on? Is Rugby or Football goingto have to make way?
Care to explain how u get £840?
Sky World with movies and sports £52, HD £10.25, ESPN £9 .. £71.25 a month.... and that is without multiroom with HD which would be another £20 a month... bringing the total to nearly £1000 a year.
£3 a day... not exactly a rip off... considering the value the 5 of us get from it.
HD multiroom from Sept is only £10 p.m. , the HD tax on multiroom is being scrapped.
Excellent news! I will probably go for that then! Maybe thinking twice about ESPN...
Age is not important here, and your absolutely right if people want to pay for it that's up to them, personally I love watching the Albion but I don't care to much for other games on TV, match of the day suits me but each to their own.
What I object to is needing to purchase Sky Sports and probably all 4 channels at that as they will switch it around each week, in order to watch something that has always been available to the masses on normal tv, loads f people will now miss out as a result of this.
I don't really think that sky sports money into football is so much of a good thing either ? clubs paying ridiculous fee's and wages as a result, the gulf in class getting bigger ect ect.