hampshirebrightonboy
Well-known member
- Sep 3, 2011
- 1,031
To control the ball Stephens had to lift his foot. Are you saying he was not within his rights to go for that ball?
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Never a red + we had boro bricking it
- Thread starter sdmartin1
- Start date
To control the ball Stephens had to lift his foot. Are you saying he was not within his rights to go for that ball?
OzMike
Well-known member
Ref sees studs up and that's that.
Icy Gull
Back on the rollercoaster
- Jul 5, 2003
- 72,015
So ref influences outcome of a massive game by an incorrect red card. What is your point? Everybody knows the ref sent Stephens off, this is a thread discussing the consequences
OzMike
Well-known member
Refs have to make on the spot decisions and get some wrong, sadly this was one of them.
Uh_huh_him
Well-known member
- Sep 28, 2011
- 12,143
The ref made an on the spot decision. yellow card.. 5 yards away.. I can accept that.
What I don't accept is changing it to red after being shown the injury. No way is that the correct decision making process.
This.
I don't buy the 'he took advice from the linesman' argument - although I'm sure that's what they will major on afterwards. He clearly looks at the wound and gives a red based on that.
Yes, he had to make a snap decision. He decided yellow - I think even that was wrong - and now they have to be honest and say that on review that snap decision was wrong.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Seasider78
Well-known member
- Nov 14, 2004
- 6,011
Watch Dean after he issues the red card our players are questioning the decision and he starts pointing to Ramirez leg. I think the footage clearly shows he issues the red for the injury not the tackle. Also as I mentioned in another thread if Dean is relying on a linesman to make a decision he is 5 yards from he is not fit to officiate
Given we are preparing for a game in 5 days time when will we know the outcome of the appeal? That's what is making me so angry about this decision the possibility that shocking decision dents our playoff hopes as well as significantly influencing the outcome of yesterday's match
Agree with that.
There should be a decision today. Will there? I have no idea.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Why the f##k should Brighton accept that! Wake up, not even a foul.
Uh_huh_him
Well-known member
- Sep 28, 2011
- 12,143
Don't think so... Pretty sure it's either rescinded or upheld, outside chance of an additional 1 match ban if considered a frivolous appeal.
I suspect they will "save face" by not adding to the ban...
Sam Ovett
The New Manager Bus
Never a foul. Still furious
Yes it has been mentioned many times, someone posted that the shin pads were the size of an iPhone ( 4 I'm guessing)
He probably did have shin pads in but they were as useless as a chocolate tea pot.