- Jan 3, 2012
- 17,336
We need players who can kick the ball better than the ones we've got
What about heading? That can be quite important, too.
We need players who can kick the ball better than the ones we've got
A totally accurate article, but an element of stating the obvious about all of it. Anyone on here with half a brain would have come up with similar.
I wonder how significant it will prove that our season has ended a month earlier than usual? Play-off teams tend to focus their energies on the promotion battle as opposed to getting contracts sorted out.
It's hard to disagree with a lot of what Naylor is saying there, and it pretty much involves wholesale playing changes. I think that extra month might prove handy!
Looking back over the past 3 seasons and this one why can't TB and PB see a clear pattern emerging that to finish in the top 2 or go up via the play offs you need to play 2 strikers up front and in some games go for it and sacrifice a midfielder with 10 minutes to go and bung on a third striker.
Well CH's job really starts now. Next few weeks he has to decide who is for the Spanish Archer, who he wants and to persuade the bods upstairs pretty much regarding the 10 points of common sense stated here.
Good luck Chrissy boy.
I wonder how significant it will prove that our season has ended a month earlier than usual? Play-off teams tend to focus their energies on the promotion battle as opposed to getting contracts sorted out.
It's hard to disagree with a lot of what Naylor is saying there, and it pretty much involves wholesale playing changes. I think that extra month might prove handy!
You mean Bamford, and Jones I guess.And at least two of those - either of which I'd welcome for next season - are loanees.
What about heading? That can be quite important, too.
Obviously it would be nice to improve recruitment effectiveness, and no doubt TB feels that a lot more than you and I, given that it's his money that's been pissed up the wall. But that's not what Naylor was saying. To buy better was too obvious even for Andy to point out (that's not a dig at you BtW). As for loosening the purse strings, how much do you think TB should be happy to lose next season, and what do we do if not promoted, having broken the FFP rules? Because we definitely can't do what Naylor says without breaking FFP rules.
No 7 - get the business done early, thus simply won't happen. We are only a moderately attractive club for potential players ( and this season hasn't helped), we negotiate hard deals, agents will be advising any half decent players to wait because better offers will come in, and they do, and hey presto ... we lose out.
I seem to remember the issue with getting things done early is that it means you may have to compromise on your main targets. If you want your number 1 target, you may to have wait. That's what happened with Clayton last summer wasn't it? You might not always get them but the last minute panic buy can be just as bad as the first minute easy buy. I don't think there is ever an easy or obvious or perfect way to do the business unless you have silly money. Otherwise, everyone would do it.
Playing the long game last summer on Clayton didn't work, but would we have been better off signing someone not as good as him early on? Besides, you often get a few very good options come available in the final weeks when the Premier League sides have to trim their squads or the free agents get that little bit more desperate to sign for a club. Don't get me wrong, like any fan, I'd love us to make brilliant signings early in the window but just because it didn't work out last summer doesn't mean that's a totally flawed way of working.
So basically, I don't think we should get in a tizz over when they sign, just hope the quality is better this time around when they do sign.
Vossen is also a season long loan I think