studio150
Well-known member
If reintroduced would being on parade be an acceptable excuse for not attending a game for PB
A former colleague was born in Greece to Greek parents who moved back to the uk when he was 2. His parents wanted to fully embrace Britain and so he never learned to speak greek. Fast forward 20 years and he got a letter, in Greek, which he was convinced told him to report for National Service. A couple more letters followed and so for 30 odd years he never went to Greece as he was convinced he would be arrested.
Finally he got his boss, who DID speak Greek to translate them and all they said was "As you live abroad you are excused".
Rather than military service I'd rather see some sort of community service. That way it doesn't drag our very limited military resources away to look after some snotty nosed 18 year olds but might still instill some dicipline and pride into them. That said I do have that nagging thing in the back of my mind that I don't like the idea of the government forcing people to do things they don't wish to.
1 month? You can't learn a great deal in a month, and will your job be kept open for you during that month?
Is it straight from school at 18 and so defer uni?
You happy to do it then?
So we're agreed then. It's not as simplistic as you first said.Given the question was for healthy males aged 17-21, it does seem somewhat silly that the lowest age band for respondents is 18-24 thereby there is no breakdown on those in the age band who would be required to undertake National Service. I would be very surprised if the 23% was evenly apportioned by each year between 18 and 24.
In an alternate world where people could take discipline, it would be a good idea IMO.
Bit for today's generation, the namby pamby brigade, who'll cry wolf everytime they were shouted at, I dont think with that it would.
What is the supposed gain from this?
What an utterly crap idea. Why not get kids to do a one month compulsory IT course, it's more likely to be of use than running round a field. Its no more relevant than an enforced pottery club.
The point is we need kids to be interested in a range of topics, some will be more interested in some than others. Encourage them to do what interests them. Why force some to do something they will hate for a month? Still, what do you expect from a country that dreamt up the Maginot line. Onion wearing, Garlic munching twats.
...it may work since their 'service' is bound to include copious amounts of poncing about
So we're agreed then. It's not as simplistic as you first said.
Would be more productive to teach them a trade surely?As someone who is probably now too old (this is for teenagers and pre-uni right?) I don't think this is necessarily a bad idea. There are an awful lot of men in particular who are drifting around without much sense of purpose. Doing something active and physical can't be bad, providing some structure and focus to people struggling for it can't be bad either. I wouldn't dismiss it out of hand.
If reintroduced would being on parade be an acceptable excuse for not attending a game for PB
Would be more productive to teach them a trade surely?
Would be more productive to teach them a trade surely?
Would be more productive to teach them a trade surely?