eastlondonseagull
Well-known member
Well whoopie f*****g doo. Aren't there better things the Yanks could be spending their money on?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4261522.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4261522.stm
Berty_G said:"Nasa administrator Dr Michael Griffin said four astronauts would be sent in a new space vehicle, in a project that would cost $104bn (£58bn). "
Obviously the Americans know how to spend their money wisely
Biscuit said:Cant they spend the money on say.. I dont know..
flood defences?
Pavilionaire said:What do you mean "return" to the moon - they never went the first time, it was all a big hoax to divert attention away from Vietnam...
Pavilionaire said:What do you mean "return" to the moon - they never went the first time, it was all a big hoax to divert attention away from Vietnam...
ditchy said:perhaps we will have more chance of building a stadium there
Biscuit said:Cant they spend the money on say.. I dont know..
flood defences?
Scotty M said:would be a bastard of a trip though
Bluejuice said:I thought the whole reason they've not sent a man up there since 1972 was that it was entirely pointless and injustifably expensive.
Correct me if I'm wrong but the moon isn't going to have changed much in the last 30 odd years so unless they're off drilling for oil what can they actually hope to achieve up there?