Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

NASA plans return to moon by 2020



Scotty Mac

New member
Jul 13, 2003
24,405
Hiney said:
Don't worry, there will be a massive Park and Ride site in the Sea of Tranquility

:thumbsup:

would litter patrols come with free space suits?
 




Hannibal smith

New member
Jul 7, 2003
2,216
Kenilworth
ben andrews' girlfriend said:
Or world poverty, aids vaccines, rebuilding of iraq etc etc.

I know it's gonna sound contraversial but i think it's immoral spending that much money on going into space when there's far more pressing issues back home

I disagree. At some point or other the sun will explode, kill us all and make the earth uninhabitable. The first step of exploration and moving to another planet has to be going to the nearest one to us with a view to going to the Mars.

There is no long term future for the human race on Earth. How can it not be a good idea to spend money on exploration?
 




maffew

Well-known member
Dec 10, 2003
9,014
Worcester England
Hannibal smith said:
I disagree. At some point or other the sun will explode, kill us all and make the earth uninhabitable. The first step of exploration and moving to another planet has to be going to the nearest one to us with a view to going to the Mars.

There is no long term future for the human race on Earth. How can it not be a good idea to spend money on exploration?

Thats a wind up yeah?

anyway whats Mars gonna orbit when the sun blows up?
 


Simster

"the man's an arse"
Jul 7, 2003
54,952
Surrey
ben andrews' girlfriend said:
Or world poverty, aids vaccines, rebuilding of iraq etc etc.

I know it's gonna sound contraversial but i think it's immoral spending that much money on going into space when there's far more pressing issues back home
I take it you don't use a mobile phone or a television then? ???
 




maffew

Well-known member
Dec 10, 2003
9,014
Worcester England
Simster said:
I take it you don't use a mobile phone or a television then? ???

its one thing putting satellites in space for comminications and defence systems, though spending a 100bn to send someone to the moon in 20 years for the crack of it is quite wrong when theres so many problems to fix here and the US needed aid from the EU when their flood defences failed. I'd be f***ing livid if I was an American tax payer
 




Hannibal smith

New member
Jul 7, 2003
2,216
Kenilworth
maffew said:
Thats a wind up yeah?

anyway whats Mars gonna orbit when the sun blows up?

No its not a wind up. Oil will also run out in around 70 years or so and Oxygen is running out (albeit very slowly). Both would make great Sun headlines - Surprised the tabloids haven't picked these ones up to be honest.

on your second point, Thats the whole point. To survive we would have to go a bit further than Mars. As an analogy we probably need to go to Australia from Britain. So far we have made it to Heathrow airport from the centre of London.
 




eastlondonseagull

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2004
13,385
West Yorkshire
Hannibal smith said:
No its not a wind up. Oil will also run out in around 70 years or so and Oxygen is running out (albeit very slowly). Both would make great Sun headlines - Surprised the tabloids haven't picked these ones up to be honest.

on your second point, Thats the whole point. To survive we would have to go a bit further than Mars. As an analogy we probably need to go to Australia from Britain. So far we have made it to Heathrow airport from the centre of London.

We're f*****d then, so no point wasting that cash :nono:
 


maffew

Well-known member
Dec 10, 2003
9,014
Worcester England
Hannibal smith said:
No its not a wind up. Oil will also run out in around 70 years or so and Oxygen is running out (albeit very slowly). Both would make great Sun headlines - Surprised the tabloids haven't picked these ones up to be honest.

on your second point, Thats the whole point. To survive we would have to go a bit further than Mars. As an analogy we probably need to go to Australia from Britain. So far we have made it to Heathrow airport from the centre of London.

:jester:
 


Hannibal smith

New member
Jul 7, 2003
2,216
Kenilworth
eastlondonseagull said:
We're f*****d then, so no point wasting that cash :nono:

All I can say it’s a good job, Christopher Columbus didn’t think ‘Sod this boating lark, I’ll stay in Rome and watch the Gladiators and the stoning’ or James Cook would went down his local and got hammered and played 3 card brag instead of exploring the world.

If you think of how far the human race has come in 2000 years, it is not unrealistic to think that we will be able to explore vast volumes of space in 2000 more – it is though if no-one invests in it.
 






Northstander

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2003
14,031
The chances of anyone landing on Mars are a million to one
 


Simster

"the man's an arse"
Jul 7, 2003
54,952
Surrey
ben andrews' girlfriend said:
Course, but i didnt spend $104bn on them!
That's about £65billion.

Which is about £10 per per person on the planet. How much was your telly again?
 




chip

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2003
1,313
Glorious Goodwood
This works out at about US$32 per year per person in the USA. It will help many of their high-tech and aerospace companies, secure many jobs and lead to the development of new materials and technologies.

I'd rather we did that than, say, pay for the new deal, give £200 to each baby born to a poor family or any of the other Blair/Brown failed schemes. Its less than we will pay the EU over that period of time.
 






Hannibal smith

New member
Jul 7, 2003
2,216
Kenilworth
Simster said:
I think we should sit here and wait for the aliens to arrive in big tripod fighting machines.

:jester:

As long as Will Smith and the president of the USofA can fly, we will send thier sorry asses right back where they came from.

You betcha.
 




Simster

"the man's an arse"
Jul 7, 2003
54,952
Surrey
Hannibal smith said:
As long as Will Smith and the president of the USofA can fly, we will send thier sorry asses right back where they came from.

You betcha.
Will Smith = MYOB, NSC Cybergeek and saviour of the human race by putting viruses on alien computers.

FACT.
 


Superseagull

Well-known member
Jul 8, 2003
2,123
If Nasa had carried on developing space exploration at the same rate as what was achieved in the 60's and 70's we would have been on Mars by the 1980's. NASA now needs billions of $ just to get the whole thing started again.

Instead the money was spent of Nuclear missiles and fighting pointless wars all over the world.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here