Less than we sold Dan Burn for several years ago. Burn was a much more limited player than Gilmour.
Maybe Gilmour's numbers aren't very good when Starlizard look at the statsAnd Burn was a bit cheap to do him a favour after years of good service.
This is really odd.
Did you see Gomez play the other day? I really would prefer Billy.Not too against this IF Gomez is joining straight after Olympics. Otherwise it would leave us a bit light
Did you see Gomez play the other day? I really would prefer Billy.
Billy should do better defensively. His role was never to be shooting all the time, but admittedly he's not good at that either.For anyone saying we shouldn't sell him.
If we didn't have him and were looking to sign a centre midfielder, how happy would you be if we were linked to Gomez and Gruda, and ended up with Gilmour?
View attachment 186217
View attachment 186218
Billy should do better defensively. His role was never to be shooting all the time, but admittedly he's not good at that either.
How does he compare in passing stats? Cherry picking a few stats that show him in a bad light doesn't show the full picture.
One of them is playing in the PL; one of them is playing in the USA - have the stats been adjusted accordingly?For anyone saying we shouldn't sell him.
If we didn't have him and were looking to sign a centre midfielder, how happy would you be if we were linked to Gomez and Gruda, and ended up with Gilmour?
View attachment 186217
View attachment 186218
Because he passes to someone else who then gets the assist, to have the vision to start off an attack or to retain possession under pressure. What's the value of a midfielder who is good at passing - really?What good is passing if it goes nowhere?
Passing is vanity, Goals and assists are sanity.
These players don't play in the same role and also not in the same league.For anyone saying we shouldn't sell him.
If we didn't have him and were looking to sign a centre midfielder, how happy would you be if we were linked to Gomez and Gruda, and ended up with Gilmour?
View attachment 186217
View attachment 186218
These players don't play in the same role and also not in the same league.
I understand from Bissouma days that the NUMBER ONE ability in any defensive minded midfielder is supposedly to shoot like Socrates. The NUMBER TWO ability is to be tall as f***, because thats a British football fantasy. Lots of people on NSC has gone on about Billy not being "big enough" for Hurzeler football. This is because they're projecting their own fantasy on to the uncertainess of Hurzelian tactics. My guess, hope and firm belief is that the team won't be built around players being tall.
I'd guess that for any defensive playmaker in our team, passing stats are going to be a lot more interesting than the 0-2 long distance shots per game a player in that role could expect.
The worst part of the comparison however is that Billy Gilmour is playing in the best league in the world while Diego Gomez has been playing in the 25th or so best. Assuming he is better than Billy is like assuming you're better than Lewis Hamilton because you bet your buddy at Mario Kart.
Billys passing does go somewhere though - usually to a teammate closer to the opponents goal.What good is passing if it goes nowhere?
Passing is vanity, Goals and assists are sanity.
Billys passing does go somewhere though - usually to a teammate closer to the opponents goal.
You can take a look at Fulham away if you want to get that "man, it'd be quite useful to have a player who can pass forward to a team mate" feeling.
For anyone saying we shouldn't sell him.
If we didn't have him and were looking to sign a centre midfielder, how happy would you be if we were linked to Gomez and Gruda, and ended up with Gilmour?