Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Murray to Cardiff?



El Presidente

The ONLY Gay in Brighton
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
40,017
Pattknull med Haksprut
I repeat my post of 5.16pm yesterday - lets have some idea of a source??!!

I write a column for the local paper, which is owned by the Manchester Evening News. The sports reporter who deals with Rochdale contacted me as wanted to know if I know the sell on clause if we sell GM.
 






bhaexpress

New member
Jul 7, 2003
27,627
Kent
I write a column for the local paper, which is owned by the Manchester Evening News. The sports reporter who deals with Rochdale contacted me as wanted to know if I know the sell on clause if we sell GM.

Blimey. you learn something new every day, I would never have though that Gay Times has a sports page :laugh:
 


drew

Drew
NSC Patron
Oct 3, 2006
23,632
Burgess Hill
Possibly but I don't believe we would allow him to miss a JPT game (that may lead to a bumper pay day) and an important league game just to avoid it looking dodgy.

Fact is he rushed back from injury and was subbed in the last game due to the very same injury. Why is it so unlikely that this injury has flaired up??

Agree, he came back early from an injury that kept him out. However, that does not suit the conspiracy theorists on this site.

But initially the Argus and official site were saying he was not playing... then Murray gets a mysterious injury? Why would they just change their minds to stop Adams pestering them? :lol:

Hope it's nothing anyway.

Don't understand this. He's got an injury so he's not playing. Why is it mysterious? Perhaps it would have suited you better if they had said 'he's not playing but we are not going to tell you why!!!'

Would it really ? I'm not so sure with the state of the FA these days.

But I'm willing to believe that if Charlton specifically wanted him and were willing to pay the money, they could stipulate they wanted to ease him in via cup competitions, especially as a player would be coming in return.

Their player playing today is quite obviously the writing on the wall. I'd be amazed if Murray isn't on his way.

Obviously a little bit lazy, no-one get really deny that - but has bags and bags of class. On his day the best striker we've had since Zamora, and possibly more saleable because he is a bit more orthadox.

Just hope we get a good deal.

I wouldn't say no to Fleetwood but don't see this as 'writing on the wall' I also disagree that Murray is lazy. Just because he doesn't run around like a headless chicken as per Revell, doesn't make him lazy. It's pathetic the amount of critics our best player has on this site.
 






Silent Bob

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Dec 6, 2004
22,172
Don't understand this. He's got an injury so he's not playing. Why is it mysterious? Perhaps it would have suited you better if they had said 'he's not playing but we are not going to tell you why!!!'
Because there was no mention of him being a doubt in the run up to the game.
 








glasfryn

cleaning up cat sick
Nov 29, 2005
20,261
somewhere in Eastbourne
Agree, he came back early from an injury that kept him out. However, that does not suit the conspiracy theorists on this site.



Don't understand this. He's got an injury so he's not playing. Why is it mysterious? Perhaps it would have suited you better if they had said 'he's not playing but we are not going to tell you why!!!'



I wouldn't say no to Fleetwood but don't see this as 'writing on the wall' I also disagree that Murray is lazy. Just because he doesn't run around like a headless chicken as per Revell, doesn't make him lazy. It's pathetic the amount of critics our best player has on this site.

spot on


was NSC around when Kennedy was shot Hmmmmmmmmmmm! could'nt have been otherwise you lot would still be theorizing conspiracies.

good entertainment though
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here