Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Murray to Cardiff?









Scotty Mac

New member
Jul 13, 2003
24,405
Adams has just said that Murray was injured

not suprising is it - we have just thrown away a two goal lead at home, he is hardly likely to come out and improve the mood by saying that murray didnt play because he is being sold and his new club dont want him cup tied
 




Dave the OAP

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
46,762
at home
if that offer as right, I would think the club will bite their hands off.

we must have made a thumping loss on todays game and we cant continue toi depend on director's pockets
 




Beach Hut

Brighton Bhuna Boy
Jul 5, 2003
72,327
Living In a Box
What is the sell on clause in Murrays contract ?
 


SeagullEd

New member
Jan 18, 2008
788
where is this rumour coming from?

PLucked out of the sky to be bluntly honest. I don't believe a word. No source at all from the looks of it. Murray is great, granted, but why him?

For 900k I would say you could get one of Lambert, Fryatt, Graham etc. And they wouldn't offer 900k anyway cos of that reason alone - they know we need money so they'd say fine we'll take our money elsewhere.

Absolute speculative crap.
 


vulture

Banned
Jul 26, 2004
16,515
el pres is not one to bullshit....maybe fleetwood was allowed to play today because he could be coming in the transfer window
 






Rookie

Greetings
Feb 8, 2005
12,324
bloody hope this is not true, think he is the one true bit of quality in the team. Will be a huge loss for the team not just the goals but chips in with some assists and is good at holding the ball up
 


Dave the OAP

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
46,762
at home
el pres is not one to bullshit....maybe fleetwood was allowed to play today because he could be coming in the transfer window


that is a very good point....fleetwood looks good on the ball
 




clapham_gull

Legacy Fan
Aug 20, 2003
25,878
Time to drop the cup-tied ruling - with the introduction of transfer windows, it doesn't make a lot of sense.
 


vulture

Banned
Jul 26, 2004
16,515
ok lets say we got 900k for murrary and spend 100k on fleetwood and 300k on Johnson and 50k on richards and 150k on joe a and 300k on thorton would you be happy
 


SeagullEd

New member
Jan 18, 2008
788
ok lets say we got 900k for murrary and spend 100k on fleetwood and 300k on Johnson and 50k on richards and 150k on joe a and 300k on thorton would you be happy

Those figures are plucked fomr the sky, but even still theoretically, I think no.

Forster isn't getting any younger and Murray is a bright young hope, try to keep hold of him. Lets invest in a few of those if we can.
 




sir danny cullip

New member
Feb 14, 2004
5,433
Burgess Hill
ok lets say we got 900k for murrary and spend 100k on fleetwood and 300k on Johnson and 50k on richards and 150k on joe a and 300k on thorton would you be happy

Cant imagine for a second that all the 900k we are apparently going to get will be put back into the playing budget. The scenario above would probably treble (if not more) the wages of Murray so some savings would have to be made to cover that. Or we could splash out and hope that Cardiff get promoted...doesn't sound like uncle Dick's way though does it!
 




Scotty Mac

New member
Jul 13, 2003
24,405
el pres is not one to bullshit....maybe fleetwood was allowed to play today because he could be coming in the transfer window

the fact that he has been allowed to play for us suggests that charlton dont see him getting much action for them this season - could be a good sign with regards to a permanent move

murray out for £900k, and i imagine we could get fleetwood in relatively cheaply for dick knight to make a nice little profit
 






itszamora

Go Jazz Go
Sep 21, 2003
7,282
London
Cardiff are not exactly flush with cash, can't see why they'd gamble nearly a million on a player totally unproven at Championship level.
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here