[Albion] Moises Caicedo - New contract signed until summer 2027 with 1 year extra option.

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊



S'hampton Seagull

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2003
6,946
Southampton
The Albion board have handled this situation impeccably. It is very rare now to get huge deal between Prem clubs in the January window, especially when the selling club does not wish to sell and financially doesn't need to sell.

I think that midfielders like Caicedo are golddust - nobody bats an eyelid at the £100million price tag attached to Declan Rice and yet - whilst he is a quality player - I'll happily stick with Caicedo thanks.

The increasingly athletic nature of the Prem means the Top 6 are desperate for his like. Liverpool have lost their zip and have dropped like a stone, similarly Chelsea's pedestrian football means they're midtable. I think between them Arsenal, Liverpool and Chelsea need 5 players of that ilk, so there is sure to be a bidding war in the summer.
All of this, good post.
 






highflyer

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2016
2,553
The excellent Rory Smith made a very similar point on the 5Live Monday Night Club a few months back. I'm guessing it was sometime around the beginning of the season when Potter was still with us.

In essence, he said the "big clubs" were happy to let the "small clubs" do the scouting, recruiting and polishing and then pay them handsomely for their efforts once a player was PL-proven.

Like it or not, that is largely how it is, isn't it?

The 'pay them handsomely' bit is doing a LOT of work in this particular deal though.

Going to have to be 'young Marlon Brando' levels of handsome to get this one over the line.
 








Springal

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2005
24,785
GOSBTS
£45m bid for Gallagher from Everton, only increases the value of Caicedo when silly money like that is being thrown at players like him!
Hilarious. So basically they’ve sold Gordon, then spent all the money on someone else. Good luck if they get relegated
 


Seasider78

Well-known member
Nov 14, 2004
6,011
The Albion board have handled this situation impeccably. It is very rare now to get huge deal between Prem clubs in the January window, especially when the selling club does not wish to sell and financially doesn't need to sell.

I think that midfielders like Caicedo are golddust - nobody bats an eyelid at the £100million price tag attached to Declan Rice and yet - whilst he is a quality player - I'll happily stick with Caicedo thanks.

The increasingly athletic nature of the Prem means the Top 6 are desperate for his like. Liverpool have lost their zip and have dropped like a stone, similarly Chelsea's pedestrian football means they're midtable. I think between them Arsenal, Liverpool and Chelsea need 5 players of that ilk, so there is sure to be a bidding war in the summer.

We should also take some time to thank Todd Boehly for helping to raise the benchmark for pricing PL quality midfielders and introducing a new £120m+ level for World Cup winning ones.

I am sure this will help Bloom and Barber hugely in the inevitable summer bidding war
 






mejonaNO12 aka riskit

Well-known member
Dec 4, 2003
21,923
England
It is true though.
Yep. It is true.

Let's have a look at the current England team. Most of the players were developed at 'lower' teams first and then bought by the 'bigger' teams. The managers at the top 6 know they are a bad 2 months away from getting the sack in most cases. They are not interested in trying to incorporate 'unknowns' from Ecuador etc into their squads with the hope that they find a few gems. 1 they don't want to risk the results and 2 making profit on these players is no where near as crucial to their business model as it is to a team in our situation

England team - Pickford - Started at a relegated Sunderland. Went to Everton
Walker - Sheffield United to Spurs
Shaw - Soton youth to Man Utd
Maguire - Sheffield United, Hull, Leicester, Man Utd
Stones - Barnsley to Everton then Man City
Rice - Still at a non big 6 team
Mount - Loaned to Derby, got his chance at Chelsea in Frank's youth revolution during the transfer embargo
Bellingham - Birmingham City to Dortmund
and so on

We have teams knocking down our door for 1 or 2 players per season, One or Two. Not all 11. We put together a cheap team and a few gems get picked off.

We are also not first, second or 3rd, showing that, however BRILLIANT we are playing at the moment, the talent we have is, overall, less than the 'big' teams, so you can't really criticise their current model or playing tried and tested players and then trying to buy the best players from the rest of the league. It's proven to work and they can afford to do it.
 




Sheebo

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2003
29,319
Yep. It is true.

Let's have a look at the current England team. Most of the players were developed at 'lower' teams first and then bought by the 'bigger' teams. The managers at the top 6 know they are a bad 2 months away from getting the sack in most cases. They are not interested in trying to incorporate 'unknowns' from Ecuador etc into their squads with the hope that they find a few gems. 1 they don't want to risk the results and 2 making profit on these players is no where near as crucial to their business model as it is to a team in our situation

England team - Pickford - Started at a relegated Sunderland. Went to Everton
Walker - Sheffield United to Spurs
Shaw - Soton youth to Man Utd
Maguire - Sheffield United, Hull, Leicester, Man Utd
Stones - Barnsley to Everton then Man City
Rice - Still at a non big 6 team
Mount - Loaned to Derby, got his chance at Chelsea in Frank's youth revolution during the transfer embargo
Bellingham - Birmingham City to Dortmund
and so on

We have teams knocking down our door for 1 or 2 players per season, One or Two. Not all 11. We put together a cheap team and a few gems get picked off.

We are also not first, second or 3rd, showing that, however BRILLIANT we are playing at the moment, the talent we have is, overall, less than the 'big' teams, so you can't really criticise their current model or playing tried and tested players and then trying to buy the best players from the rest of the league. It's proven to work and they can afford to do it.
Can’t see any there that were developed at premier league clubs currently in the top 6 🤷🏻‍♂️
 




mejonaNO12 aka riskit

Well-known member
Dec 4, 2003
21,923
England
No, it's not.
Arsenal have the resources to scout and develop players but they are either crap at it or too lazy and impatient.
Not the best time to come out with this statement when their current squad (whilst top of the league) includes:

Saliba (signed when 19 i think), Marquinhos, Martinelli, Smith-Rowe, Saka and Nketiah
 








Sheebo

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2003
29,319
That's literally my point.
You said it’s true that the arsenal fan said Brightons role is to develop talent for Arsenal etc. then listed a load of lower clubs than Brighton are now who developed other players. And I said none of those clubs were in the top 6 of the prem like we currently are. It’s not our job to do that, we’re higher up the spectrum now no?

Unless I’ve read what you said wrong you are justifying arsenal fans saying it’s our job to develop players for them?
 


ConfusedGloryHunter

He/him/his/that muppet
NSC Patron
Jul 6, 2011
2,413
Yep. It is true.

Let's have a look at the current England team. Most of the players were developed at 'lower' teams first and then bought by the 'bigger' teams. The managers at the top 6 know they are a bad 2 months away from getting the sack in most cases. They are not interested in trying to incorporate 'unknowns' from Ecuador etc into their squads with the hope that they find a few gems. 1 they don't want to risk the results and 2 making profit on these players is no where near as crucial to their business model as it is to a team in our situation

England team - Pickford - Started at a relegated Sunderland. Went to Everton
Walker - Sheffield United to Spurs
Shaw - Soton youth to Man Utd
Maguire - Sheffield United, Hull, Leicester, Man Utd
Stones - Barnsley to Everton then Man City
Rice - Still at a non big 6 team
Mount - Loaned to Derby, got his chance at Chelsea in Frank's youth revolution during the transfer embargo
Bellingham - Birmingham City to Dortmund
and so on

We have teams knocking down our door for 1 or 2 players per season, One or Two. Not all 11. We put together a cheap team and a few gems get picked off.

We are also not first, second or 3rd, showing that, however BRILLIANT we are playing at the moment, the talent we have is, overall, less than the 'big' teams, so you can't really criticise their current model or playing tried and tested players and then trying to buy the best players from the rest of the league. It's proven to work and they can afford to do it.
How about Rashford, Kane or Foden? They all been dropped?
 


SeagullinExile

Well-known member
Sep 10, 2010
6,192
London
It is true though.
That may be so, but isn’t it about time somebody told them where to go?

I honestly think the so called big teams are shitting their pants, worrying that a mid table team like ourselves, Fulham or Brentford are going to break their monopoly of the English game.
 






mejonaNO12 aka riskit

Well-known member
Dec 4, 2003
21,923
England
You said it’s true that the arsenal fan said Brightons role is to develop talent for Arsenal etc. then listed a load of lower clubs than Brighton are now who developed other players. And I said none of those clubs were in the top 6 of the prem like we currently are. It’s not our job to do that, we’re higher up the spectrum now no?

Unless I’ve read what you said wrong you are justifying arsenal fans saying it’s our job to develop players for them?

You've read it wrong.
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top