Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Mo Farah



BigGully

Well-known member
Sep 8, 2006
7,139
Did I say he was the greatest? Did anyone? It's nonsense to cross off his achievements and not consider him as an all time great though because he hasn't broken a world record. Farah has consistently beaten the top runners in the big races when it matters, it doesn't make him the greatest of all time but the world record is a separate issue and shouldn't devalue what he has achieved though.

No-one has got close to the record since it was set. It will take something very special to break the record at 10,000m, it will happen one day but I don't think it will be anytime soon.

Now c'mon, you based your post around the insignificance of not holding or hardly ever holding a world record, you even gave tactical examples why Mo hadnt been prolific in the record stakes, but Gebrselassie said exactly the opposite.
 




Tyrone Biggums

Well-known member
Jun 25, 2006
13,498
Geelong, Australia
So you have conclusive evidence that the Out of Africa theory is a myth, and not true?

No of course you don't :rolleyes:

Either do you, all you'll quote is a theory like I have.

Discoveries in China open up the posibility of the out of africa theory being debatable.

The point is however that through DNA some groups of people are more "British" than others. By a long way.
 


El Presidente

The ONLY Gay in Brighton
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
40,006
Pattknull med Haksprut
An interesting choice of comparison. I'd make the argument that Gebrselassie and Farah are roughly equal - both at the very top of the tree, with fewer than a handful of additional real competitors for the title of all-time greatest distance runner.

Farah beats him hands down in terms of major titles: 4 Olympic golds and 5 (so far) World golds plays 2 and 4 respectively. Gebrselassie beats Mo on WR though.

However, my real point is that, when we are comparing these two athletes, it is like comparing Pele, Messi, Moore, Ryan Harley,Beckenbauer etc for the title of all time best footballer. Mo is, imo and by any reasonable empirical analysis of the facts, in that sort of league. As is Gebrselassie.

Corrected for you.
 




Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,144
Goldstone
Either do you
Either?
all you'll quote is a theory like I have.
No, that's not what you did. You didn't say 'there's an alternative theory I believe', you said that the Out of Africa theory has been proven to be a myth. You're wrong, it hasn't been proven to be a myth. Indeed most experts believe it is the correct theory.

Discoveries in China open up the posibility of the out of africa theory being debatable.
That's a much more reasonable view point, I'm all for debating the theory to see if it's correct.

The point is however that through DNA some groups of people are more "British" than others. By a long way.
Well that depends on what British means doesn't it. Although a couple of you seem to think it requires British ancestry going back thousands of years, that's only an opinion, not a fact.
 




Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,144
Goldstone
Well it seems Haile Gebrselassie doesn't agree with you ......

Asked if Farah's achievements make him the greatest, Gebrselassie said: "I believe he's very good, I didn't do what he did, but he hasn't done one thing that I did.

"One thing he needs to do between the 5,000m and the 10,000m is to break the world record.

"He has won everything, he did all that. But he needs to beat the time."

http://news.sky.com/story/x-10544177
It's a fair point for Gabie to raise, but I'm not sure I agree. The WR makes more sense for short sprints, but for the 5,000m and 10,000m your time depends on the effort put in by the rest of the field, so Mo can't beat it without others running quicker. Mo's job is to beat the people next to him and he's done that time and time again. More runners these days like to save a bit for the sprint though, so the pace isn't as high at the start, which makes the WR unobtainable.
 


The Birdman

New member
Nov 30, 2008
6,313
Haywards Heath
image.jpeg
 


TimWatt

Active member
Feb 13, 2011
166
Richmond
Natural athletic ability is an individual thing with very little relation to race. Some times it seems like that but mostly it's down to other cultural and environmental issues. At most there may be a 50/50 relation with individual genes versus environment but there are many other factors too - including in Mo's case an ultra-comeptive and deep seated desire to win - which may come partly from his origins (tough mostly Hounslow upbringing) but mostly his own character and motivation.
As mentioned, in terms of athletics, he was discovered by his Hounslow schools PE teacher, nurtured by his local athletics club - and latterly a well funded support system (plus what must be considerable earnings).
So you could say his advantages come almost entirely down to himself and his success - and that level of success is unprecedented in his field (or rather track).
 




seagull_in_malaysia

Active member
Aug 18, 2006
910
Reading
It's Somalian rather than British biology in terms of his athletic ability and that's where it falls down for me. Good luck to him, great guy but it never really feels like a British victory. That's biological fact, not racism/xenophobia.

How would you classify someone who is mixed race? Only 50% of the win attributable to either side?
 


Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
62,691
The Fatherland
Well it seems Haile Gebrselassie doesn't agree with you ......

Asked if Farah's achievements make him the greatest, Gebrselassie said: "I believe he's very good, I didn't do what he did, but he hasn't done one thing that I did.

"One thing he needs to do between the 5,000m and the 10,000m is to break the world record.

"He has won everything, he did all that. But he needs to beat the time."

http://news.sky.com/story/x-10544177

I can't speak for all his world records but I pretty sure all his marathon WRs were all in Berlin which is well known for its relatively weak field and perfectly backs up my earlier posts.

Edit: a quick Google states he planned these and deliberately chose Berlin.
 


dazzer6666

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Mar 27, 2013
55,533
Burgess Hill
It's a fair point for Gabie to raise, but I'm not sure I agree. The WR makes more sense for short sprints, but for the 5,000m and 10,000m your time depends on the effort put in by the rest of the field, so Mo can't beat it without others running quicker. Mo's job is to beat the people next to him and he's done that time and time again. More runners these days like to save a bit for the sprint though, so the pace isn't as high at the start, which makes the WR unobtainable.

The WRs are almost always set with paid pacemakers. They aren't usually races, they are staged time trials for a single athlete dressed up as races. The world champs and olympics are proper races - as well as raw pace, also require significant tactical nouse (the 5k on Saturday was a great example - even with the Ethiopians ganging up on Mo, he still out-ran them by running pretty much a perfect race). The WR attempts usually involve following another runner, then trying to bomb the last couple of laps. Pretty sure Mo could give it a good go if he wanted, but he focuses more on the WC and Olympics.
 




BigGully

Well-known member
Sep 8, 2006
7,139
I watched Mo Farah documentary last night , most enjoyable watching, but for me the stand out moment in the context of this thread was when concluding both Usain Bolt and Seb Coe summed up Mo Farah as 'ONE of the best ever' and not 'THE best ever'.

For me without holding World Records @ 5000m and 10000m along without his Championship achievements, there is always another contender that doesn't allow you that ultimate accolade.
 




big nuts

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2011
4,877
Hove
Just worked out his average mile pace was 4:19 so just under 65 seconds per lap that's quite incredible.

Our greatest ever athlete and possibly ever sportsman.
 




DavidinSouthampton

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jan 3, 2012
17,354
Wow. Just wow. The man is amazing. Arguably the greatest British athlete of all time? Whatever people might say about where he was born, he was developed by the British system. Amazing performance.
 




knocky1

Well-known member
Jan 20, 2010
13,108
Wow. Just wow. The man is amazing. Arguably the greatest British athlete of all time? Whatever people might say about where he was born, he was developed by the British system. Amazing performance.

Nike, Oregon and Salazar may disagree. Brilliant runner though. We'll have him back, if Trump throws him and his family out.
 


Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
56,106
Faversham
Oh, how the OP must be thrilled by how this thread has turned out :wrong:

When this popped up again I was tempted to suggest merging with the thread I just started but . . . nah . . . . leave it :lolol:
 






DavidinSouthampton

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jan 3, 2012
17,354
Nike, Oregon and Salazar may disagree. Brilliant runner though. We'll have him back, if Trump throws him and his family out.

Point taken, but I meant his initial potential was picked up by our education system etc. He wa's not imported as a developed athlete as, for example, Zola Budd was.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here