Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[News] Middle East conflict







Greenbag50

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2016
501
This is a fairly sickening euphemism when amongst the IDF actions have included bombing hospitals, sniping civilians seeking refuge in a church and even killing unarmed escaped Israeli hostages who were unclothed from the waist up and waving white flags!
Like I said, there is always civilian casualties, especially if those civilians are deliberately placed there as they know they will be collateral damage, due to Hamas hiding beneath and among them.
Any comment on my other points re Muslims killing other Muslims?
Didn’t think so
 


pocketseagull

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2014
1,360
Any comment on my other points re Muslims killing other Muslims?
I don't understand your point? We shouldn't comment on Israeli war crimes because Muslims are also killed by other Muslims in other countries? It doesn't make sense.

I think people are rightly outraged by what they're seeing because the response is wildly disproportionate and the mistreatment of Palestinians has been ongoing for decades.
 


Greenbag50

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2016
501
I don't understand your point? We shouldn't comment on Israeli war crimes because Muslims are also killed by other Muslims in other countries? It doesn't make sense.

I think people are rightly outraged by what they're seeing because the response is wildly disproportionate and the mistreatment of Palestinians has been ongoing for decades.
Of course we should comment (and are doing so) on what Israel is doing in Gaza. They are trying to get rid of a terrorist group who are trying to wipe them of the face of the earth.
Hamas are hiding under and in where civilians live, so to kill terrorists, there will be civilian casualties. Hamas knows this and is executing its PR plan brilliantly.
You can also comment on the same level of atrocities ( worse in Syrias case where Assad used gas again his own people), happening in Syria and Sudan.
I don’t hear a thing about from UN, any main media outlets, mass street protests calling for the genocide in Khartoum to stop for 2 reasons;
1- No Jews are attacking Muslims, so no story
2- Muslims are attacking and killing fellow Muslims on a massive scale which is not news worthy and doesn’t involve Jews.

Can you not see the bias and one sided narrative which is pervasive? If you want to tell a story, you have to hear both sides, even if it doesn't fit your narrative to do so.

 


aolstudios

Well-known member
Nov 30, 2011
5,272
brighton
I don't understand your point? We shouldn't comment on Israeli war crimes because Muslims are also killed by other Muslims in other countries? It doesn't make sense.

I think people are rightly outraged by what they're seeing because the response is wildly disproportionate and the mistreatment of Palestinians has been ongoing for decades.
His point is, there's worse going on constantly in other countries.
But no Jews, no news
 






Zeberdi

“Vorsprung durch Technik”
NSC Patron
Oct 20, 2022
6,905
Why don’t other Muslim countries accept them as refugees?
They have done but already there are sizeable populations of Palestinian refugees in Jordan, Syria and Lebanon - also in Iraq and Europe.

However, in the context of this war, as @Bakero said, unless the Right to Return is guaranteed, any push for a large scale acceptance of more refugees will be seen (and is already by Muslim states) as the ethnic cleansing of Palestines from the historic land of Palestine and de facto denial of any future for an independent Palestinian State (which Netanyahu openly admits to). It is tantamount to genocide to forcibly remove a nation of people from their homeland, mass slaughtering of innocent members of the population and making the land inhabitable. Refugee camps where people live in abject conditions as a result of violent conflict for obvious reasons can also be a petri dish for radicalism which no one wants the headache to deal with.
 


pocketseagull

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2014
1,360
Israel prides itself as a beacon of democracy so why shouldn't it be held to a high standard? Although tbf Tom Hark you were seemingly advocating for ethnic cleansing as an end game so unsure if you believe that Israel is actually ever held to account.
 




Zeberdi

“Vorsprung durch Technik”
NSC Patron
Oct 20, 2022
6,905
Of course we should comment (and are doing so) on what Israel is doing in Gaza. They are trying to get rid of a terrorist group who are trying to wipe them of the face of the earth.
Hamas are hiding under and in where civilians live, so to kill terrorists, there will be civilian casualties. Hamas knows this and is executing its PR plan brilliantly.
You can also comment on the same level of atrocities ( worse in Syrias case where Assad used gas again his own people), happening in Syria and Sudan.
I don’t hear a thing about from UN, any main media outlets, mass street protests calling for the genocide in Khartoum to stop for 2 reasons;
1- No Jews are attacking Muslims, so no story
2- Muslims are attacking and killing fellow Muslims on a massive scale which is not news worthy and doesn’t involve Jews.

Can you not see the bias and one sided narrative which is pervasive? If you want to tell a story, you have to hear both sides, even if it doesn't fit your narrative to do so.

What has Sudan or Khatoum got to do with a thread about Israel/Gaza/Hamas? Your thread that presumably you started to discuss the Hamas atrocities. But how Israel has responded changed the narrative. Not by justifying Hamas’s attacks but in the horrific ‘punishment’ continuing to be perpetrated in response to them.

If there is a bias towards the POV on this thread that Israel‘s response to the Hamas attacks has gone too far, is disproportionate and exacting a massive humanitarian cost on innocent civilians then that is a bias shared by the majority of Countries worldwide and a POV that is not political but rooted in the reality of humanitarian crises.

We can go back to discussing how despicable Hamas‘s attack on Israel was, but there is no debate there - everyone absolutely agrees on that.

Everyone also agrees that Israel is under the grip of a right wing Government that wants the Palestinian people to live under permanent military occupation (or ideally to be ‘evacuated’ from Gaza) and have no State of their own.
 
Last edited:


Tom Hark Preston Park

Will Post For Cash
Jul 6, 2003
72,311
Israel prides itself as a beacon of democracy so why shouldn't it be held to a high standard? Although tbf Tom Hark you were seemingly advocating for ethnic cleansing as an end game so unsure if you believe that Israel is actually ever held to account.
So what's an alternative end game? Palestinians stay in an Israel-administered ghetto forever?
 






Krafty

Well-known member
Apr 19, 2023
2,065
His point is, there's worse going on constantly in other countries.
But no Jews, no news
20,000 people have died because of this conflict in 2023. I think there are very few countries who are in a worse situation currently compared to Israel and Palestine.

Even if there is significantly worse issues going on in other countries (which I doubt there is) then so what? Many people have been affected by this conflict, and many more are interested in understanding about it (including myself).
 


pocketseagull

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2014
1,360
So what's an alternative end game? Palestinians stay in an Israel-administered ghetto forever?
I don't know how the situation is resolved, I would hope with negotiation and compromise from all parties. Unfortunately I don't see that coming all the time that Israel is allowed to commit war crime with impunity. Apartheid or ethnic cleansing don't appear to be the options of a country being held to higher standards.
 






Bakero

Languidly clinical
Oct 9, 2010
14,882
Almería
Except they do nothing of the sort, unless your narrative tells you that they do

Nothing of the sort?

Depriving civilians of food and water is certainly a bit war crimey. Then there's the mass civilian casualties.

Whether war crimes have been committed is for a court to decide but in light of the past couple of months it can't be dismissed out of hand.
 


Zeberdi

“Vorsprung durch Technik”
NSC Patron
Oct 20, 2022
6,905
Firstly, Ghazi Hamad is clearly a reprehensible individual. Clearly hold innocent Palestinians in as much contempt as his holds Israelis and happy to see children die as he pontificates from the safety of the UAE or elsewhere.

However, that interview where he calls for repeated attacks is nearly 2 months old. I'm not suggesting he's seen the light and is now advocating peaceful coexistence; but your earlier post was misleading.

Edit: link to story on the interview: https://www.timesofisrael.com/hamas...oct-7-onslaught-many-times-to-destroy-israel/
He is reprehensible - and obviously will claim the attack on Israel is justifiable.

However in that interview he doesn’t not call for the “annihilation of Israel’ as misleadingly posted by Dr Eli but for the ‘facist government of Israel’ to be isolated.

Those complaining about ‘bias‘ in the links I posted fron the UN and Sky News a few days ago, should also be aware that Dr Eli is an Israeli propagandist conspiracy theorist who has excellent credentials in AI and dog whistles to Islamophobics - I’d be very suspect of anything that man posts on X frankly



 


Bakero

Languidly clinical
Oct 9, 2010
14,882
Almería
I'm not basing
He is reprehensible - and obviously will claim the attack on Israel is justifiable.

However in that interview he doesn’t not call for the “annihilation of Israel’ as misleadingly posted by Dr Eli but for the ‘facist government of Israel’ to be isolated.

Those complaining about ‘bias‘ in the links I posted fron the UN and Sky News a few days ago, should also be aware that Dr Eli is an Israeli propagandist conspiracy theorist who has excellent credentials in AI and dog whistles to Islamophobics - I’d be very suspect of anything that man posts on X frankly




I'm not basing it on anything Eli David said. Ghazi Hamad's words were: "Israel is a country that has no place on our lands. We must remove that country and (it) must be finished"

The interview asked him if that meant the annihilation of Israel and he replied, "Yes, of course".

 


Zeberdi

“Vorsprung durch Technik”
NSC Patron
Oct 20, 2022
6,905
I'm not basing

I'm not basing it on anything Eli David said. Ghazi Hamad's words were: "Israel is a country that has no place on our lands. We must remove that country and (it) must be finished"

The interview asked him if that meant the annihilation of Israel and he replied, "Yes, of course".


Aah that is a completely different X tweet to the one I watched above and what I was commenting on and I think you misunderstood my post - my comments relating to the interview not saying Hamas was calling for the annihilation of Israel weren’t directed at what you were saying either but what Dr Eli was saying in the first X tweet post before you posted your James Cleverly tweet of the whole interview.

It doesn’t change the fact anything by Dr Eli is going to be biased against Palestinians/muslims though.

Having now watched the whole clip from your post - that Hamas speaker is bone chillingly dispicable.
 
Last edited:




Bakero

Languidly clinical
Oct 9, 2010
14,882
Almería
Aah that is a completely different X tweet to the one I watched above and what I was commenting on and I think you misunderstood my post - my comments relating to the interview not saying Hamas was calling for the annihilation of Israel weren’t directed at what you were saying either but what Dr Eli was saying in the first X tweet post before you posted your James Everly tweet of the whole interview.

It doesn’t change the fact anything by Dr Eli is going to be biased against Palestinians/muslims though.

Yeah, I've come across a few tweets of his and the agenda is clear.

When I used the word "annihilation", I'd checked a few sources to find the full interview before commenting.
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here