Seems to me that England have routinely coughed up a lot of chances to the opposition in this competition.
The US are the first who can and will take advantage of that.
The US are the first who can and will take advantage of that.
To be fair these are a good side.
Seems to me that England have routinely coughed up a lot of chances to the opposition in this competition.
The US are the first who can and will take advantage of that.
When they turn it on, the US side look a cut above any women’s football I’ve seen.
This has the feel of an England's men semi final. As soon as we come up against a decent side we lose.
How has the England Kepper been lobbed twice from headers
The yank girls squeal a lot
How has the England Kepper been lobbed twice from headers
The women’s game is even worse for feigning injury and the ref stopping it. The standard of referees is very poor considering.
Only one yellow so far for simulation though.
There was 1990 as well. As for last year, come on Sweden in the quarter final were full of championship quality players. I know they historically seem to raise their standard against England though.The standard kind of gets better as you go through a tourno though....!
I’d also argue Croatia & Spain are pretty decent sides at the moment (Nations League)
I’d also argue Holland & Spain were decent enough in 96
I assume you’re basing that comment on last years WC which I’d disagree with also. As Colombia, Sweden etc are decent sides and all there on merit having won many qualifiers. I find that comment about last year only losing to ‘decent’ sides a little insulting to our achievements and a bit lazy / The Sun like personally...