One of the top rated left sided players in Spain with Barca fans wanting him back.
We will get gazumped as per.
At least you rated him but you were typically wrong in your underestimation of the club; the recruitment department in particular.
One of the top rated left sided players in Spain with Barca fans wanting him back.
We will get gazumped as per.
MaybeAt least you rated him but you were typically wrong in your underestimation of the club; the recruitment department in particular.
With our recruitment we find all manner of players - many being developmental punts. Cucurella was bought to address a long-standing issue at left back and is, to quote the bungle****, Oven-Ready. We have broken, only once, the top-10 barrier. If you're going to maintain and meet the oft-quoted "established top-10" objective - then you just don't sell players like Cucurella, especially after the ONE season he's just had. That's not our model.
If (and it’s a big if) he does go to City this summer, it’ll be for at least £45m.
Yep, I said exactly this either here or on another thread about it.
The bidding STARTS at 60, it doesn't end there. We have a left footed, Barca trained, player of the season with four years on his contract and a reputation greater than Steve Bruce's beer belly and we have no ready made replacement. That's WAY more valuable than Ben White.
Yes we do - it is our model - IF the price is right. It's what being a sustainable club is all about. We sold our POTS (even if the voting was weighted by sad Leeds fans) last year, for the price we wanted.
No reason it won't happen again. I'd love Cucu to stay for another year - but I'd have loved another year of Ben White in the strpes too.
Did you miss the bit that was in bold and italics and in CAPITAL LETTERS - and the four words that followed it? Or did you just choose to ignore it? Or think it didn't reflect .... err ..... nuanced?Nuance. Ben White was a BHA academy product, developed through the loan system and is a fabulous player - but at the time, and for £50m, and given we are the centre half factory, he was replaceable. Cucurella was identified and bought for many millions to fill a first team weakness. City, Spurs and Chelsea are looking for a marauding left back. They are not easy to find, and Cucurella is not easily replaceable by Brighton. Like almost every other club on the planet, we will sell our players. However, the chairman and the club have stated 'established top 10' ambitions and no doubt more lofty private targets for the (copyright Sky) best league in the world. There are multiple layers involved in the sustainability model (see Norwich City).
... He’s agreed personal terms and a contract until 2027, now City will send an official offer and Brighton will accept....
Needs a few BHA replies
have tapping up rules gone or would they just not care?
[tweet]1530225884229259264[/tweet]
Needs a few BHA replies
Did you miss the bit that was in bold and italics and in CAPITAL LETTERS - and the four words that followed it? Or did you just choose to ignore it? Or think it didn't reflect .... err ..... nuanced?
You seemed to be making a direct comparison to us selling Ben White after just a season in the stripes without acknowledging the obvious differences.Did you miss the bit that was in bold and italics and in CAPITAL LETTERS - and the four words that followed it? Or did you just choose to ignore it? Or think it didn't reflect .... err ..... nuanced?
[tweet]1530225884229259264[/tweet]
Needs a few BHA replies
[tweet]1530225884229259264[/tweet]
Needs a few BHA replies