Messi not as strong on the ball. No one has come close to Maradona on dribbling skills with strength.He really was amazing.
It’s either Maradona or Messi. Very little between them both but they’re ahead of everyone else.
Messi not as strong on the ball. No one has come close to Maradona on dribbling skills with strength.He really was amazing.
It’s either Maradona or Messi. Very little between them both but they’re ahead of everyone else.
Oh well that's alright then. He must be the greatest player if he got away with itNot as much as most are today. He was fouled and got up and continued. The hand of god. He got away with it !!
Time to let it go and not use one cheating incident to decide he wasn’t all that. Most top international strikers/midfielders/ defenders cheat, this was just a high profile one that MIGHT have screwed England over. No guarantee we were winning that game.Oh well that's alright then. He must be the greatest player if he got away with it
f***. That, look at the kits. Quality!It is an iconic photo - but completely misleading in what it portrays:-
Diego Maradona against Belgium: the real story behind the famous image
I've been relearning French all this year . . . I think 'greteast player' translates as 'Batard thricheur geant'Oh well that's alright then. He must be the greatest player if he got away with it
He wasn't all that purely because he was a CHEAT. I cannot understand why people are so willing to overlook that.Time to let it go and not use one cheating incident to decide he wasn’t all that. Most top international strikers/midfielders/ defenders cheat, this was just a high profile one that MIGHT have screwed England over. No guarantee we were winning that game.
Please don’t tell me that you are a big Harry Kane fan when he plays for England, that would be quite hypocritical
It’s noticeable how much more muscular, and presumably stronger, players legs were back then.
Think he’s the exception rather than the rule thoughHave you seen Igor's legs?
Cheating or opportunism?He wasn't all that purely because he was a CHEAT. I cannot understand why people are so willing to overlook that.
Did Pele cheat? What about Cruyff? Best? Puskas? I am not aware that they did so why compare someone who did cheat to them?
Nope, I cannot stand Harry Kane.
Cocaine ? And still won World Cup and 2 league titles for Napoli. It’s not performance enhancing !!There will always be "buts"
For example, how good would Ronaldo, Messi and Pele have been if they were off their tits on illegal drugs?
Who knows?
Well, was he the greatest footballer ever?
Ignore all the obvious “yes buts” this is just a question about his footballing skills.
For me neither Ronaldo or Messi come close
Not Pele or Cruyff either
Some of these dribbles, twist, turns and nutmegs defy belief and some serious attempts at gbh on him too
STATS !!!!!!Maradona doesn't get close to Messi for virtually any stat or attribute.
Look at this iconic photo which shows how dangerous he was with the ball at his feet - the opposition have no idea what is happening next and are all over the place:
View attachment 180883
I'm intrigued as to why everybody says Pele was the business when, truth be told, we never really saw that much of him, did we? Yes, we've all seen his World Cup highlights – and there's no doubt he was a top, top, top, top, top player – but is that all we're going on?Cheating or opportunism?
Regardless, not as good as Pele anyway.
Nobody has mentioned Eusebio, he’d be in a top 10 for me.
This is so true. Better protection from refs too. And huge leaps in drugs as well.I was disappointed with the movie about him, which didn't show enough footage of him with the ball at his feet imo. To imagine him playing on the flat "carpet" pitches we have here now and without the physical assaults of the game back in that era - he'd be better than Ronaldo and Messi, for sure.
Is that Tomas Brolin?