Wrong answer. It most definitely is
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Football] Man Utd v Liverpool
- Thread starter Me and my Monkey
- Start date
Wrong answer. It most definitely is
- Aug 24, 2020
- 7,471
Who is there now to challenge City for the title? Potter, step forward. This is your moment.
Not sure I understand the offside rule anymore
You can’t rule out a goal on a tight off-side at Old Trafford, VAR know that.
TBH 2-0 isn’t a funny score. The funny scores from here are 2-2, 2-3 or 5+ nil.
Stephen Seagull
Well-known member
Not sure I understand the offside rule anymore
Its simple really, if it's United and you can zoom out far enough for the line to seem level then it's onside
- Jun 20, 2021
- 3,944
Definitely looked offside, even on the freeze frame with the lines on the pitch, he looked off.
Cheshire Cat
The most curious thing..
This isn't going quite to plan.
I know I am incredibly biased but we play better football than both of these cloggers
I think you're being harsh. These two are in the bottom third of the table. You can't expect teams down there to play as well as a top 5 team like us.
Glad it’s not just me! Was sure that would be disallowed. Pleased for Rashford that it wasn’t though.
Wish we were playing Liverpool this weekend, they look shot.
- Jun 20, 2021
- 3,944
Looking at the Liverpool bench, I actually think our bench on Sunday was a lot stronger than that.
But saying that I can see why Liverpool have been linked with Caceido. There midfield don't look that good anymore
But saying that I can see why Liverpool have been linked with Caceido. There midfield don't look that good anymore
Icy Gull
Back on the rollercoaster
- Jul 5, 2003
- 72,015
Liverpool are absolute shite tonight.
FFS don’t say that, half our team will be all over Romano and other knobheads Twitter feeds tomorrow as being on their way to Anfield.
One good thing about VAR is I think it’s made refs more confident about booking players for diving. ASM against us last week, Fernandes just now, that has to be a good thing.
Fernandes is undoubtedly the biggest **** in the league.
fruitnveg
Well-known member
I see your Fernandes and raise you a Richarlison.
[tweet]1561809657882152962[/tweet]
This is the premier league twitter feed, with the VAR image. I think the image posted above has the VAR line in it, but as what looks like a picture of a screen of the image, this is a little clearer.
I'm not sure the line is right against the defender's shoulder as it seems to be aiming for, but if you're taking it from the defenders shoulder, isn't it close enough that if it was disallowed it would be one of those "it's a toenail!" decisions that we want removed from the game? We've spent the last couple of seasons complaining about tight decisions not going in the attacker's favour, can we really complain when it does?
In a change of topic, Fernandes just got booked for diving. It feels like there have already been quite a few bookings for diving this season, but I've not seen any reports of refs clamping down on it. I'm not complaining, just noticing.
This is the premier league twitter feed, with the VAR image. I think the image posted above has the VAR line in it, but as what looks like a picture of a screen of the image, this is a little clearer.
I'm not sure the line is right against the defender's shoulder as it seems to be aiming for, but if you're taking it from the defenders shoulder, isn't it close enough that if it was disallowed it would be one of those "it's a toenail!" decisions that we want removed from the game? We've spent the last couple of seasons complaining about tight decisions not going in the attacker's favour, can we really complain when it does?
In a change of topic, Fernandes just got booked for diving. It feels like there have already been quite a few bookings for diving this season, but I've not seen any reports of refs clamping down on it. I'm not complaining, just noticing.
dadams2k11
ID10T Error
Hope Liverpool are still this shit on the 1st October, or can we bring them forward 5 games?
